Closed
Bug 1248945
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
Intermittent 795892-1.html | application crashed [None]
Categories
(Core :: General, defect)
Core
General
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 1239162
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox47 | --- | affected |
People
(Reporter: cbook, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: intermittent-failure)
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?job_id=3304746&repo=mozilla-central
04:35:50 INFO - REFTEST PROCESS-CRASH | http://10.0.2.2:8854/tests/dom/media/test/crashtests/795892-1.html | application crashed [None]
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
Maire, it looks like this media test just started failing frequently within the last day or so. Any thoughts on what caused it or who could work it? Thanks!
Flags: needinfo?(mreavy)
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
Paul -- Can you tell me if this is crash is in cubeb or elsewhere -- e.g. in Playback?
The relevant test is this one:
dom/media/test/crashtests/795892-1.html
Thanks.
Flags: needinfo?(mreavy) → needinfo?(padenot)
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
Nope, I can't, there is nothing in the log, the minidump stack walking did not work. I could not find a occurrence of this with decoded stacks, clicking through multiple failures on brassstack.
Flags: needinfo?(padenot)
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
![]() |
||
Comment 6•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Ben Kelly [:bkelly] from comment #2)
> Maire, it looks like this media test just started failing frequently within
> the last day or so. Any thoughts on what caused it or who could work it?
dom/media/test/crashtests/795892-1.html was just updated in bug 1248543. https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/0d9af8eaf17f didn't trigger Android crashtests, but it looks like the cause.
jwwang - can you have a look? This is failing frequently.
Flags: needinfo?(jwwang)
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment 8•9 years ago
|
||
Scrolling down a bit in the log I see:
Fatal signal 11 (SIGSEGV) at 0xe5e5e5e5 (code=1), thread 1149 (Compositor)
That's a bit worrying since it indicates a use-after-free.
I can't tell if that's the original crash reason though.
Comment 9•9 years ago
|
||
It is very easy to repro on Android 4.3 API15+ debug. Try: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?job_id=17016048&repo=try
With the symbols (http://archive.mozilla.org/pub/mobile/try-builds/jwwang@mozilla.com-12efe31b9333414fc9796a90ff7171c46aa71642/try-android-api-15-debug/) I am able to decode the backtrace:
00992fcf FUNC 992f1c 114 0 mozilla::gl::AndroidSurfaceTexture::~AndroidSurfaceTexture
00a07347 FUNC a072f4 90 0 mozilla::layers::AndroidSurfaceTextureData::~AndroidSurfaceTextureData
00a07389 FUNC a07384 12 0 mozilla::layers::AndroidSurfaceTextureData::~AndroidSurfaceTextureData
009d9631 FUNC 9d9598 a8 0 mozilla::layers::DestroyTextureData
009da1c3 FUNC 9da0d8 35c 0 mozilla::layers::DeallocateTextureClient
009da583 FUNC 9da494 118 0 mozilla::layers::TextureClient::Destroy
009da5bd FUNC 9da5ac d8 0 mozilla::layers::TextureClient::~TextureClient
009da689 FUNC 9da684 12 0 mozilla::layers::TextureClient::~TextureClient
00990bbf FUNC 990aa0 1e4 0 mozilla::AtomicRefCountedWithFinalize<mozilla::layers::TextureClient>::Release
00990c8f FUNC 990c84 12 0 RefPtr<mozilla::layers::TextureClient>::~RefPtr
009d7e8f FUNC 9d7e28 c0 0 nsTArray_Impl<mozilla::layers::ImageClientSingle::Buffer, nsTArrayInfallibleAllocator>::RemoveElementsAt
009fd703 FUNC 9fd6b0 ac 0 mozilla::layers::FlushAllImagesSync
005b6023 FUNC 5b5ff0 4c 0 MessageLoop::RunTask
I think the change of bug 1248543 reveals a bug of gfx.
Flags: needinfo?(jwwang)
Comment 10•9 years ago
|
||
It looks the same issue of bug 1239162.
Hi Peter,
Can you confirm if bug 1239162 fix the problem here?
step to repro:
Run crashtests on Android with |./mach try -b do -p android-api-15 -u reftest -t none|
Flags: needinfo?(howareyou322)
Comment 11•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to JW Wang [:jwwang] from comment #9)
> It is very easy to repro on Android 4.3 API15+ debug. Try:
> https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?job_id=17016048&repo=try
>
> With the symbols
> (http://archive.mozilla.org/pub/mobile/try-builds/jwwang@mozilla.com-
> 12efe31b9333414fc9796a90ff7171c46aa71642/try-android-api-15-debug/) I am
> able to decode the backtrace:
>
> 00992fcf FUNC 992f1c 114 0
> mozilla::gl::AndroidSurfaceTexture::~AndroidSurfaceTexture
> 00a07347 FUNC a072f4 90 0
> mozilla::layers::AndroidSurfaceTextureData::~AndroidSurfaceTextureData
> 00a07389 FUNC a07384 12 0
> mozilla::layers::AndroidSurfaceTextureData::~AndroidSurfaceTextureData
> 009d9631 FUNC 9d9598 a8 0 mozilla::layers::DestroyTextureData
> 009da1c3 FUNC 9da0d8 35c 0 mozilla::layers::DeallocateTextureClient
> 009da583 FUNC 9da494 118 0 mozilla::layers::TextureClient::Destroy
> 009da5bd FUNC 9da5ac d8 0 mozilla::layers::TextureClient::~TextureClient
> 009da689 FUNC 9da684 12 0 mozilla::layers::TextureClient::~TextureClient
> 00990bbf FUNC 990aa0 1e4 0
> mozilla::AtomicRefCountedWithFinalize<mozilla::layers::TextureClient>::
> Release
> 00990c8f FUNC 990c84 12 0 RefPtr<mozilla::layers::TextureClient>::~RefPtr
> 009d7e8f FUNC 9d7e28 c0 0
> nsTArray_Impl<mozilla::layers::ImageClientSingle::Buffer,
> nsTArrayInfallibleAllocator>::RemoveElementsAt
> 009fd703 FUNC 9fd6b0 ac 0 mozilla::layers::FlushAllImagesSync
> 005b6023 FUNC 5b5ff0 4c 0 MessageLoop::RunTask
>
> I think the change of bug 1248543 reveals a bug of gfx.
The patch of bug 1239162 was trying to fix use-after-free in server side(compositor).
It is related but I'm not sure it helps or not.
Trigger another try to check the reproduce rate.
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=5c151afb00e1
Flags: needinfo?(howareyou322)
![]() |
||
Comment 12•9 years ago
|
||
I triggered several Android crashtests on https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=5c151afb00e1 -- all green!
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment 14•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Geoff Brown [:gbrown] from comment #12)
> I triggered several Android crashtests on
> https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=5c151afb00e1 -- all
> green!
Wow, that's good news for me. I will mark this as duplicate of but 1239162
Updated•9 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•