Closed
Bug 1254081
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 3 years ago
[e10s] tabpaint regressions (Windows XP and Linux)
Categories
(Core :: General, defect, P3)
Core
General
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INACTIVE
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
e10s | + | --- |
People
(Reporter: gkrizsanits, Assigned: gkrizsanits)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
e10s vs non-e10s: linux64 pgo 23.78% osx-10-10 opt -16.64% windows7-32 pgo 12.84% windows8-64 pgo 5.19% windowsxp pgo 25.49% https://treeherder.allizom.org/perf.html#/e10s
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Blocks: e10s-perf
tracking-e10s:
--- → ?
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
https://treeherder.allizom.org/perf.html#/e10s?filter=tabpaint Is this a new talos test?
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → gkrizsanits
Priority: -- → P1
Updated•9 years ago
|
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/e10s?filter=tabpaint
Summary: [e10s] tabpaint regressions on windows and linux → [e10s] tabpaint regressions (Windows XP and Linux)
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jim Mathies [:jimm] from comment #1) > https://treeherder.allizom.org/perf.html#/e10s?filter=tabpaint > > Is this a new talos test? Yes, I added this test recently to make sure we don't regress the more common case of opening tabs (opened both from the parent and the child). This spun out of my tpaint work.
Comment 5•3 years ago
|
||
Too old regression to track.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 3 years ago
Resolution: --- → INACTIVE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•