Closed
Bug 1260103
Opened 5 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
Block plugin pop-up close button is barely visible
Categories
(Firefox :: Theme, defect)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
FIXED
Firefox 48
People
(Reporter: cornel_ionce, Assigned: dao)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
|
1.87 KB,
patch
|
Gijs
:
review+
ritu
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
[Affected versions]: - Firefox 45.0.1 - Firefox 46 beta 5 - Latest 47.0a2 Aurora - Latest 48.0a1 Nightly [Affected platforms]: - Windows 10 x64 - Windows 7 x64 - Ubuntu 14.04 x86 [Steps to reproduce]: 1. Make sure you are using an old/blocked flash version. 2. Open Firefox using a clean profile. 3. Navigate to a flash content website. 4. Notice the outdated plugin prevention message. [Expected result]: The message is correctly displayed with every element visible. [Actual result]: The close button is barely visible. [Regression range]: I was able to track down a regression range on Windows 10x64. Last good: 20150717030202 First bad: 20150718030211 Pushlog: https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=15155971639c&tochange=d317a93e5161 Caused by: ac6f2fb6777e Dão Gottwald — Bug 1173729 - Update generic close icon and new tab button icon on Windows 10. r=jaws [Additional notes]: - Screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/xx9xP2S.png - Hovered state: http://i.imgur.com/DBytoRr.png - This issue does not reproduce on Mac OS X 10.9.5
Dao can you take a look here?
Flags: needinfo?(dao)
| Assignee | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
OS: All → Windows
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•5 years ago
|
||
This is because we set a custom background for this notification bar: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?string=pluginVulnerable&case=on I'd suggest that we stop doing that and use the standard notification bar styling.
Flags: needinfo?(dao) → needinfo?(benjamin)
Comment 3•5 years ago
|
||
We decided explicitly that it was more important for this to be the same styling as the in-content blocked plugin notification. I'd like to keep that if possible. We already have a close icon for this case: are we never using it or only not using it in this new win10 case?
Flags: needinfo?(benjamin)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•5 years ago
|
||
Assignee: nobody → dao
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #8739365 -
Flags: review?(gijskruitbosch+bugs)
Comment 5•5 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8739365 [details] [diff] [review] patch Review of attachment 8739365 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- This reproduces on Linux as well, at least on Nightly, so we should fix it there, too.
Attachment #8739365 -
Flags: review?(gijskruitbosch+bugs)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•5 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8739365 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8739376 -
Flags: review?(gijskruitbosch+bugs)
Updated•5 years ago
|
Attachment #8739376 -
Flags: review?(gijskruitbosch+bugs) → review+
Comment 8•5 years ago
|
||
| bugherder | ||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/1ea84d818c7d
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 5 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 48
| Reporter | ||
Comment 9•5 years ago
|
||
Confirming the fix on Latest Nightly 48, build ID: 20160410030224. Verified on: * Windows 10 x64 * Windows 7 x64 * Ubuntu 14.04 x86
Regression from Firefox 42, wontfix for 46 at this point. Ritu, do you want this for beta? css only change, though it is late in beta.
tracking-firefox47:
--- → ?
Flags: needinfo?(rkothari)
Hi Dao, if this is a low-risk fix, since its a very visible regression I am open to uplifting to Beta47. What do you think?
Flags: needinfo?(rkothari) → needinfo?(dao+bmo)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 12•5 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8739376 [details] [diff] [review] patch Approval Request Comment [Feature/regressing bug #]: bug 1173729 [User impact if declined]: see comment 0 [Describe test coverage new/current, TreeHerder]: no test coverage [Risks and why]: simple CSS fix, low risk [String/UUID change made/needed]: none
Flags: needinfo?(dao+bmo)
Attachment #8739376 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Comment 13•5 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Dão Gottwald [:dao] from comment #12) > Comment on attachment 8739376 [details] [diff] [review] > patch > > Approval Request Comment > [Feature/regressing bug #]: bug 1173729 > [User impact if declined]: see comment 0 > [Describe test coverage new/current, TreeHerder]: no test coverage > [Risks and why]: simple CSS fix, low risk > [String/UUID change made/needed]: none 48 is on aurora, and this was fixed in 48 - did you mean to request beta approval?
Flags: needinfo?(dao+bmo)
| Assignee | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(dao+bmo)
Attachment #8739376 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora? → approval-mozilla-beta?
Comment on attachment 8739376 [details] [diff] [review] patch Visual regression, though it has been shipping since 45, the fix is simple and has been verified on Nightly, Beta47+
Attachment #8739376 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta? → approval-mozilla-beta+
Hi Wes, fyi this fix needs to be uplifted to m-b. Thanks!
Flags: needinfo?(wkocher)
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-beta/rev/7abf386fee3f
Flags: needinfo?(wkocher)
Comment 17•5 years ago
|
||
Setting the flag for verification on 47.0b9.
Flags: qe-verify+
Flags: needinfo?(cornel.ionce)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 18•5 years ago
|
||
Confirming this issue is fixed on Firefox 47.0b9, build ID 20160526140250.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•