1264065 - Treeherder build for flame is using the wrong base image

Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: General, defect)

Description

[Naoki Hirata :nhirata (please use needinfo instead of cc)]

1. see https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=pine&selectedJob=13574&filter-searchStr=B2G%20Device%20Image%20debug%20Flame%20KitKat%20Device%20Image%20Flame%20KitKat%20Device%20Image%20Build%20%28Engineering%29%20Flame-KK%28Be%29

The log result is :
http://archive.mozilla.org/pub/b2g/tinderbox-builds/pine-flame-kk_eng-debug/1460424611/b2g_pine_flame-kk_eng-debug_dep-bm71-build1-build0.txt.gz

Towards the bottom shows : 
19:06:52     INFO -  Blob setup script has changed, re-running
19:06:52     INFO -  Backing up system partition to backup-flame
19:06:52    ERROR -  ./extract-files.sh: line 27: adb: command not found
19:06:52     INFO -  Pulling files from ../../../backup-flame
19:06:52     INFO -  cat: ../../../backup-flame/system/build.prop: No such file or directory
19:06:52     INFO -  cat: ../../../backup-flame/system/build.prop: No such file or directory
19:06:52     INFO -  Invalid system backup - Wrong base version found.
19:06:52     INFO -  Do this:
19:06:52     INFO -  1. Delete backup-flame
19:06:52     INFO -  2. Flash your device with KK based images from the vendor
19:06:52     INFO -  3. Try building again
19:06:52     INFO -  
19:06:52     INFO -  > Build failed! <

Comment 1

[:gerard-majax]

Looks like this is running out of Buildbot. I think we should kill flame-kk from BB and switch to TaskCluster one?

Comment 2

[Wander Lairson Costa]

Flame-kk builds were removed from Taskcluster in Bug 1255644

Comment 3

[Naoki Hirata :nhirata (please use needinfo instead of cc)]

Should we kill both?  Or reinstate the taskcluster one?  Who should make that call?
Do we need to recreate an image?  Should we have this as a discussion point at the next gaia meeting?

Comment 4

[:gerard-majax]

Well, I would suggest we kill it. Wander explained me on IRC that we could reuse what have been legacied: Flame KK never completed the transition to TaskCluster, but there is task definition still in m-c ... :)

Comment 5

[Pochy]

Hi guys

Following the idea from discourse and with the announcement in the meeting for b2g_infra about that we have support from the infra by a few time, we thinking in finishing the transition for flame-KK to TC, at least eng, or we need (opt and debug) too.

wcosta, It is just revert the part for flame-KK of your patch in bug 1255644? or what other tasks, would be necessary, for finish the transition to TC.

Jovan is doing the blobfree build manually for flame, I talked to him and maybe he can help in this too.

Comment 6

[Wander Lairson Costa]

(In reply to Pochy from comment #5)
> Hi guys
> 
> Following the idea from discourse and with the announcement in the meeting
> for b2g_infra about that we have support from the infra by a few time, we
> thinking in finishing the transition for flame-KK to TC, at least eng, or we
> need (opt and debug) too.
> 
> wcosta, It is just revert the part for flame-KK of your patch in bug
> 1255644? or what other tasks, would be necessary, for finish the transition
> to TC.
> 

Yes. But the builds were scheduled for b2g-inbound, if you are using a different branch, it might need further work (nothing complex, however).

> Jovan is doing the blobfree build manually for flame, I talked to him and
> maybe he can help in this too.

Comment 7

[:gerard-majax]

flame-kk has been removed in 1284447