Closed
Bug 1284564
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
"Update Behavior" in system add-on spec does not describe behavior
Categories
(Toolkit :: Add-ons Manager, defect)
Toolkit
Add-ons Manager
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla50
People
(Reporter: rhelmer, Assigned: rhelmer)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: triaged)
Attachments
(1 file)
The "Update Behavior" section describes ``<updates></updates>`` as removing everything and ``<addons></addons>`` as doing nothing, the opposite is true.
This is correct elsewhere in the document, so it's contradictory currently.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/62412/diff/#index_header
See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/62412/
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8768077 -
Flags: review?(mkelly)
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
BTW I just tested and see something odd about the ``<addons></addons>`` case:
* if we have not applied any updates, nothing happens and this is logged:
https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/c9a70b64f2faa264296f0cc90d68a2ee2bac6ac5/toolkit/mozapps/extensions/internal/XPIProvider.jsm#3045
* if there *have* been any updates applied, then instead all updates are removed and all default add-ons are disabled, as documented.
Based on the log messages, it's making it all the way to the end of `updateSystemAddons()` in this case.
Fixing this should probably be a separate bug, but should we document the current behavior for now or leave it alone?
Flags: needinfo?(mkelly)
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8768077 -
Flags: review?(mkelly)
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8768077 [details]
Bug 1284564 - correct update behavior section of system add-on spec
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/62412/#review59632
::: toolkit/mozapps/extensions/docs/SystemAddons.rst:173
(Diff revision 1)
> A response from AUS with an empty add-on set will *disable all system add-ons*:
>
> .. code-block:: xml
>
> <updates>
> <addons></addons>
Doesn't this example need to be `<updates></updates>` now? Since a missing addons tag disables all the add-ons?
::: toolkit/mozapps/extensions/docs/SystemAddons.rst:197
(Diff revision 1)
>
> The other 90% of the time, AUS sends out an empty response:
>
> .. code-block:: xml
>
> <updates></updates>
Same here, I think with your changes this needs the `<addons></addons>` tag.
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Robert Helmer [:rhelmer] from comment #2)
> BTW I just tested and see something odd about the ``<addons></addons>`` case:
>
> * if we have not applied any updates, nothing happens and this is logged:
> https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/
> c9a70b64f2faa264296f0cc90d68a2ee2bac6ac5/toolkit/mozapps/extensions/internal/
> XPIProvider.jsm#3045
Ah, that makes sense, the two empty sets match. Reading through the code again, `addonList` is `null` if the `<addons>` tag is missing, and `[]` if it is present but empty.
> * if there *have* been any updates applied, then instead all updates are
> removed and all default add-ons are disabled, as documented.
>
> Based on the log messages, it's making it all the way to the end of
> `updateSystemAddons()` in this case.
I guess I don't quite understand what `systemAddonLocation.cleanDirectories()` is actually doing. Is it literally deleting all the system add-ons from the profile directory? I expected it to just get rid of temporary directories or something.
> Fixing this should probably be a separate bug, but should we document the
> current behavior for now or leave it alone?
Documenting the current behavior I think is the thing to do.
Flags: needinfo?(mkelly)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Michael Kelly [:mkelly,:Osmose] from comment #4)
> (In reply to Robert Helmer [:rhelmer] from comment #2)
> > BTW I just tested and see something odd about the ``<addons></addons>`` case:
> >
> > * if we have not applied any updates, nothing happens and this is logged:
> > https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/
> > c9a70b64f2faa264296f0cc90d68a2ee2bac6ac5/toolkit/mozapps/extensions/internal/
> > XPIProvider.jsm#3045
>
> Ah, that makes sense, the two empty sets match. Reading through the code
> again, `addonList` is `null` if the `<addons>` tag is missing, and `[]` if
> it is present but empty.
>
> > * if there *have* been any updates applied, then instead all updates are
> > removed and all default add-ons are disabled, as documented.
> >
> > Based on the log messages, it's making it all the way to the end of
> > `updateSystemAddons()` in this case.
>
> I guess I don't quite understand what
> `systemAddonLocation.cleanDirectories()` is actually doing. Is it literally
> deleting all the system add-ons from the profile directory? I expected it to
> just get rid of temporary directories or something.
It removes outdated sets of update add-ons - each set of add-ons are installed into a subdirectory generated with a UUID: http://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/92616e983b8ad6e99ec148f341e146c3c6fa312a/toolkit/mozapps/extensions/internal/XPIProvider.jsm#8395
`cleanDirectories()` removes files not currently in use or pending use after restart.
Temporary files go in the OS-specified temp locations so they aren't really an issue.
> > Fixing this should probably be a separate bug, but should we document the
> > current behavior for now or leave it alone?
>
> Documenting the current behavior I think is the thing to do.
OK will do, I think it's definitely confusing as-is and something we should fix but I'll file a separate bug for that.
Updated•9 years ago
|
Whiteboard: triaged
Comment 6•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8768077 [details]
Bug 1284564 - correct update behavior section of system add-on spec
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/62412/#review61132
LGTM, r+
Attachment #8768077 -
Flags: review+
Pushed by rhelmer@mozilla.com:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/4b1f7a028b0e
correct update behavior section of system add-on spec r=mkelly
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Robert Helmer [:rhelmer] from comment #5)
> (In reply to Michael Kelly [:mkelly,:Osmose] from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Robert Helmer [:rhelmer] from comment #2)
> > > BTW I just tested and see something odd about the ``<addons></addons>`` case:
> > >
> > > * if we have not applied any updates, nothing happens and this is logged:
> > > https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/
> > > c9a70b64f2faa264296f0cc90d68a2ee2bac6ac5/toolkit/mozapps/extensions/internal/
> > > XPIProvider.jsm#3045
> >
> > Ah, that makes sense, the two empty sets match. Reading through the code
> > again, `addonList` is `null` if the `<addons>` tag is missing, and `[]` if
> > it is present but empty.
> >
> > > * if there *have* been any updates applied, then instead all updates are
> > > removed and all default add-ons are disabled, as documented.
> > >
> > > Based on the log messages, it's making it all the way to the end of
> > > `updateSystemAddons()` in this case.
> >
> > I guess I don't quite understand what
> > `systemAddonLocation.cleanDirectories()` is actually doing. Is it literally
> > deleting all the system add-ons from the profile directory? I expected it to
> > just get rid of temporary directories or something.
>
>
> It removes outdated sets of update add-ons - each set of add-ons are
> installed into a subdirectory generated with a UUID:
> http://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/
> 92616e983b8ad6e99ec148f341e146c3c6fa312a/toolkit/mozapps/extensions/internal/
> XPIProvider.jsm#8395
>
> `cleanDirectories()` removes files not currently in use or pending use after
> restart.
>
> Temporary files go in the OS-specified temp locations so they aren't really
> an issue.
>
>
> > > Fixing this should probably be a separate bug, but should we document the
> > > current behavior for now or leave it alone?
> >
> > Documenting the current behavior I think is the thing to do.
>
>
> OK will do, I think it's definitely confusing as-is and something we should
> fix but I'll file a separate bug for that.
Filed bug 1287191 to follow up on this.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 9•9 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
status-firefox50:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla50
Comment 10•8 years ago
|
||
bugherder uplift |
status-firefox49:
--- → fixed
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•