Closed
Bug 1302549
Opened 8 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
add more g2.2xlarge machines to buildbot-configs and slavealloc
Categories
(Infrastructure & Operations Graveyard :: CIDuty, task)
Infrastructure & Operations Graveyard
CIDuty
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: jlund, Assigned: aobreja)
References
Details
Attachments
(2 files, 2 obsolete files)
586 bytes,
patch
|
coop
:
review+
aobreja
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
8.77 KB,
text/csv
|
aobreja
:
checked-in+
|
Details |
No description provided.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•8 years ago
|
||
currently we have: 300 use1 entries in slavealloc. only 100 of those are enabled 200 usw2 entries in slaveallow. *0* of those are enabled
See Also: → 1229791
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•8 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jordan Lund (:jlund) from comment #1) > currently we have: > > 300 use1 entries in slavealloc. only 100 of those are enabled > > 200 usw2 entries in slaveallow. *0* of those are enabled sorry, to be more accurate. we have: * 100 use1 "g-w732-spot-* g2.2xlarge" enabled * 0 usw2 "g-w732-spot-* g2.2xlarge" enabled * 200 use1 "t-w10-spot-* g2.2xlarge" disabled * 100 usw2 "t-w10-spot-* g2.2xlarge" disabled can the 't-w10-spot-*' be used for 'g-w732-spot-*' related jobs? at any rate, we need usw2 spot instances enabled. Ideally every machine should be the same. e.g. "g-w732-spot-*"
Comment 3•8 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jordan Lund (:jlund) from comment #2) > * 100 use1 "g-w732-spot-* g2.2xlarge" enabled > * 0 usw2 "g-w732-spot-* g2.2xlarge" enabled > * 200 use1 "t-w10-spot-* g2.2xlarge" disabled > * 100 usw2 "t-w10-spot-* g2.2xlarge" disabled > > can the 't-w10-spot-*' be used for 'g-w732-spot-*' related jobs? This is purely a nomenclature thing to make it clear when an instance is running tests for w7 vs w10. We should add 100 entries for g-w732-spot to usw2 in slavealloc. Make sure we update the buildbot-configs too.
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•8 years ago
|
||
Adding the slaves to slavealloc.
Attachment #8791261 -
Flags: review?(coop)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•8 years ago
|
||
Buildbot-config changes.
Attachment #8791262 -
Flags: review?(coop)
Comment 6•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8791261 [details] bug1302549_slavealloc.csv datacenter is listed as "us-weast-2" but should be "us-west-2" r+ with that change
Attachment #8791261 -
Flags: review?(coop) → review+
Comment 7•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8791262 [details] [diff] [review] bug1302549_bb.patch Review of attachment 8791262 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: mozilla-tests/production_config.py @@ +26,4 @@ > for i in range(1, 101) + range(102, 600): # Omit 101 due to win7 golden issues // Bug 1223509 > SLAVES['win7_vm']['t-w732-spot-%03i' % i] = {} > > +for i in range(1, 201): Your CSV is adding up to g-w732-spot-201, so it needs to be range(1, 202) because of the way range() works. r+ with that change.
Attachment #8791262 -
Flags: review?(coop) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•8 years ago
|
||
New csv with changes west and last machine g-w732-spot-200.
Attachment #8791261 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•8 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8791497 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8791262 -
Flags: checked-in+
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8791498 -
Flags: checked-in+
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•8 years ago
|
||
New 100 g-w732-spot machines were added having this configuration (usw2 and g2.2xlarge) New machines are g-w732-spot-[101-200] mysql> select count(*) from slaves where name like 'g-w732-spot%'; +----------+ | count(*) | +----------+ | 200 | +----------+ 1 row in set (0.01 sec) mysql> select slaveid, name from slaves where name like 'g-w732-spot%' order by cast(substring(name, -3) as unsigned) desc limit 5; +---------+-----------------+ | slaveid | name | +---------+-----------------+ | 32210 | g-w732-spot-200 | | 32208 | g-w732-spot-199 | | 32206 | g-w732-spot-198 | | 32204 | g-w732-spot-197 | | 32202 | g-w732-spot-196 | +---------+-----------------+ 5 rows in set (0.00 sec) Should we enable these new 100 machiens?
Flags: needinfo?(coop)
Updated•8 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → aobreja
Comment 11•8 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Andrei Obreja [:aobreja][:buildduty] from comment #10) > Should we enable these new 100 machines? Yes, please.
Flags: needinfo?(coop)
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•8 years ago
|
||
All new g-w732-spot machines were enabled.
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•6 years ago
|
Product: Release Engineering → Infrastructure & Operations
Updated•4 years ago
|
Product: Infrastructure & Operations → Infrastructure & Operations Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•