Currently, in all trees, macosx64/release-l10n is bad (we have never used macosx64/release-l10n as we used macosx-universal/release-l10n. However, with the dropping of universal builds, we need to fix the macosx64/release-l10n as the following need to be replaced: if [ "$MOZ_UPDATE_CHANNEL" == "beta" ]; then ac_add_options --with-l10n-base=../../releases/l10n/mozilla-beta fi; if [ "$MOZ_UPDATE_CHANNEL" == "release" ]; then ac_add_options --with-l10n-base=../../releases/l10n/mozilla-release fi;
macosx64 release-l10n is old (and was never used).. updating to reflect the required entries.
Assignee: nobody → ewong
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #8841397 - Flags: review?(frgrahl)
This patch needs to be uplifted to c-a only as c-b and c-r are still using universal builds.
Summary: Fix macosx64's release-l10n for invalid entries → Fix macosx64's release-l10n for invalid entries and update debug mozconfig to include --enable-calendar
Comment on attachment 8841446 [details] [diff] [review] [mozconfigs] update osx64 release-l10n and debug [Approval Request Comment] Regression caused by (bug #): 1329379 User impact if declined: no l10n OSX builds Testing completed (on m-c, etc.): c-c Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): none String changes made by this patch:
https://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/abb720f671051534799f598a131ea7ac26a36987 Bug 1342826 - Update macosx64 release-l10n mozconfig. r=frg
Comment on attachment 8841446 [details] [diff] [review] [mozconfigs] update osx64 release-l10n and debug a=me for c-a
Attachment #8841446 - Flags: approval-comm-aurora? → approval-comm-aurora+
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.