Closed
Bug 1373707
Opened 7 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
Include users with only webextensions in Release to receive Multi using the system add-on
Categories
(Firefox :: Extension Compatibility, defect)
Firefox
Extension Compatibility
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Firefox 56
People
(Reporter: shell, Assigned: mrbkap)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [multi])
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
59 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
Felipe
:
review+
lizzard
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
|
Details |
Multi is first going out to users without add-ons in 54 (throttling up). After that is to all the users that qualify and looks good, we need to expand to Release users that have only WebExtensions. WebExtensions + Multi cohort was been in Beta 54.
Pros:
Expanding to that population will de-risk 57, by exposing any issues early in what will be the 57 release configuration. We only saw one issue in Beta (see below), there are no other known issues. It also gets Multi out to a broader audience, ideally improving their experience before 57.
Cons:
The Beta difference in stability between multi + no add-ons and multi + webextension cohorts was 1 more crash per 25,000 hours of use with WebExtensions. The small increase is outweighed by the benefits. The difference was a higher EnqueuePromiseReactionJob crash occurrence in WE. Still the Pros of expanding outweigh this Cons. The scale is misleading - but if needed is here stability between cohorts https://sql.telemetry.mozilla.org/queries/4355#8685
Mitigation:
we can watch that crash signature for a big change between before and after the new cohort is added and remove Webextensions from getting Multi if needed.
Note:
Please engage with Ben to validate in telemetry that the targeting is hitting the right add-ons. Along with QA, that has been the most successful way of finding issues in targeting before release.
Reporter | ||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Summary: Target users with only webextensions in Release to receive Multi → Include users with only webextensions in Release to receive Multi using the system add-on
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Assignee | ||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Attachment #8878600 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8878600 -
Flags: review?(felipc)
Comment 4•7 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8878599 [details]
Bug 1373707 - Enable e10s-multi for users with webextensions on Release.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/149914/#review154680
Attachment #8878599 -
Flags: review?(felipc) → review+
Pushed by mrbkap@mozilla.com:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/615ffcb208c4
Enable e10s-multi for users with webextensions on Release. r=Felipe
Comment 6•7 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
status-firefox56:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 56
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•7 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8878599 [details]
Bug 1373707 - Enable e10s-multi for users with webextensions on Release.
Approval Request Comment
[Feature/Bug causing the regression]: n/a
[User impact if declined]: Needed for e10s-multi rollout strategy.
[Is this code covered by automated tests?]: No.
[Has the fix been verified in Nightly?]: Not yet.
[Needs manual test from QE? If yes, steps to reproduce]: Will send email to pi-request.
[List of other uplifts needed for the feature/fix]: None.
[Is the change risky?]: No.
[Why is the change risky/not risky?]: Only changes the e10s rollout addon.
[String changes made/needed]: n/a
Attachment #8878599 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Updated•7 years ago
|
status-firefox55:
--- → affected
Comment 8•7 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8878599 [details]
Bug 1373707 - Enable e10s-multi for users with webextensions on Release.
Limit for e10s-multi cohort on release - let's uplift this for beta 5.
Attachment #8878599 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta? → approval-mozilla-beta+
Comment 9•7 years ago
|
||
bugherder uplift |
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•