Open Bug 1411212 Opened 2 years ago Updated Last year
--disable-optimize makes host programs get compiled without optimize flags
We have detected a build metrics regression from push: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/pushloghtml?changeset=7ce72fc1ce814f7ddacddf39f0e1da78c6261fd3 As author of one of the patches included in that push, we need your help to address this regression. Regressions: 84% build times summary windows-mingw32-32 debug taskcluster-m4.4xlarge 2,187.25 -> 4,026.99 Improvements: 100% sccache hit rate summary windows-mingw32-32 debug taskcluster-m4.4xlarge 1.00 -> 0.00 You can find links to graphs and comparison views for each of the above tests at: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/alerts?id=10124 On the page above you can see an alert for each affected platform as well as a link to a graph showing the history of scores for this test. There is also a link to a treeherder page showing the jobs in a pushlog format. To learn more about the regressing test(s), please see: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Performance/Automated_Performance_Testing_and_Sheriffing/Build_Metrics
Component: Untriaged → Build Config
Product: Firefox → Core
:tjr Was this increase build time expected?
(In reply to Ionuț Goldan [:igoldan], Performance Sheriffing from comment #0) > Improvements: > > 100% sccache hit rate summary windows-mingw32-32 debug > taskcluster-m4.4xlarge 1.00 -> 0.00 Going from 1.0 to 0.0 is not an improvement, it's a regression! It's going from 100% cache hit to 0%. That's probably a problem for all the regressions/improvements reported for sccache hits, so this should be fixed (and I don't know where that'd be)
Thanks for pointing this out!
oh we need to indicate that this is a higher == better type of regression. There is an attribute in PERFHERDER_DATA which we need to set: "lowerIsBetter": false http://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/search?q=lowerIsBetter&path= I am not sure who setup the PERFHERDER_DATA posting from build data, but this should be easy to fix for whoever did it.
(In reply to Ionuț Goldan [:igoldan], Performance Sheriffing from comment #1) > :tjr Was this increase build time expected? It sounds reasonable. Before we didn't build tests. Now we do. I bet there's a lot of tests. As for sscache misses, I would expect us to get a 100% miss rate for the first build since we changed how we build literally everything (I think.) However, I gather from this that we're missing sscache on everything all the time now. That seems wrong, but I'm not sure what would cause it.
(In reply to Joel Maher ( :jmaher) (UTC-5) from comment #4) > oh we need to indicate that this is a higher == better type of regression. > There is an attribute in PERFHERDER_DATA which we need to set: > "lowerIsBetter": false > > http://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/search?q=lowerIsBetter&path= > > I am not sure who setup the PERFHERDER_DATA posting from build data, but > this should be easy to fix for whoever did it. Filed bug 1411304 on this.
Since we have a build break from Bug 1411187 I'm thinking this is causing the cache to completely miss all the time.
I'm trying to figure out the sccache regression. One thing I figured out though is: 'Good' sccache results: > Compile requests 6 > Compile requests executed 3 > Cache hits 3 > Cache misses 0 'Bad' sccache results: > Compile requests 6 > Compile requests executed 3 > Cache hits 0 > Cache misses 3 There's nothing directly obvious in the sccache.log files. The 'good' one has lots of cache hits (2784) and the broken one doesn't (122). Reverse of misses: 40 for the good one, 2700 for the broken one. So it seems there's two things at play: Why doesn't sccache invoke for the majority of the MinGW build and why is it missing on the three things it used to invoke on.
Have you managed to look further into this issue?
Not since Comment 8, no. I guess the next step is to get sccache running locally and starting learning how it works. As far as the regression goes, I think the regression is less important than "MinGW doesn't use sccache nearly at all"
(In reply to Tom Ritter [:tjr] from comment #10) > Not since Comment 8, no. I guess the next step is to get sccache running > locally and starting learning how it works. > > As far as the regression goes, I think the regression is less important than > "MinGW doesn't use sccache nearly at all" Have you filed a bug for this bigger issue? If so, please link it to this bug, using the "See also" field.
(In reply to Ionuț Goldan [:igoldan], Performance Sheriffing from comment #11) > (In reply to Tom Ritter [:tjr] from comment #10) > > Not since Comment 8, no. I guess the next step is to get sccache running > > locally and starting learning how it works. > > > > As far as the regression goes, I think the regression is less important than > > "MinGW doesn't use sccache nearly at all" > > Have you filed a bug for this bigger issue? If so, please link it to this > bug, using the "See also" field. I have not, I was planning on just trying to address both in this bug.
14:29:47 T<tjr> Does it know how to handle mingw? Cause it doesn't cache anything for it either... 14:32:46 T<@ted> mingw is just gcc, so i suspect so 14:32:55 T<@ted> but maybe it doesn't understand some of the options it uses? 14:33:32 T<@ted> tjr: if you have a local mingw build environment you can try it with sccache logging enabled and see what it thinks 14:33:57 T<@ted> export SCCACHE_ERROR_LOG=/tmp/sccache.log; export RUST_LOG=sccache=trace 14:34:04 T<tjr> I do, that was my next step, although I'm not sure what exactly to look for. I'll see if anything jumps out 14:34:06 T<@ted> and then grep the log for 'CannotCache'
Ted doesn't need this in his queue.
Okay, I've finally tracked this one down. If you've got --disable-optimize specified, sccache doesn't do its thing. MinGW normally has --disable-optimize. Here's a try run with MinGW debug without that: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=0b0d6134c566744fd8c1b9f92758a351947146cc&selectedJob=167239048 > [task 2018-03-11T02:43:02.725Z] 02:43:02 INFO - Compile requests 3628 > [task 2018-03-11T02:43:02.725Z] 02:43:02 INFO - Compile requests executed 3489 > [task 2018-03-11T02:43:02.725Z] 02:43:02 INFO - Cache hits 792 > [task 2018-03-11T02:43:02.725Z] 02:43:02 INFO - Cache misses 2697 And linux x86 debug does not specify --disable-optimize. But here's a run where it does specify it: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=6f1978c478f17792a8d603634ee5d7ebbd19e5d8&selectedJob=167239067 > [task 2018-03-11T03:41:32.617Z] 03:41:32 INFO - Compile requests 6 > [task 2018-03-11T03:41:32.617Z] 03:41:32 INFO - Compile requests executed 3 > [task 2018-03-11T03:41:32.617Z] 03:41:32 INFO - Cache hits 0 > [task 2018-03-11T03:41:32.617Z] 03:41:32 INFO - Cache misses 3 This might be intended behavior, but when I asked ted about it (a while ago) he didn't think it was supposed to do this, so tagging him and glandium.
Summary: 84.11% build times (windows-mingw32-32) regression on push 7ce72fc1ce814f7ddacddf39f0e1da78c6261fd3 (Mon Oct 23 2017) → sccache doesn't work when --disable-optimize is specified
> [task 2018-03-11T03:41:32.617Z] 03:41:32 INFO - Compile requests 6 This seems bad, but maybe it's a red herring? Looking at the compile log shows that sccache is in the compile commandline: [task 2018-03-11T02:21:01.634Z] 02:21:01 INFO - /builds/worker/workspace/build/src/sccache2/sccache /builds/worker/workspace/build/src/gcc/bin/g++ -m32 -march=pentium-m -o mozalloc_abort.o -c -DDEBUG=1 -D_GNU_SOURCE -DIMPL_MFBT -DMOZ_HAS_MOZGLUE -I/builds/worker/workspace/build/src/memory/mozalloc -I/builds/worker/workspace/build/src/obj-firefox/memory/mozalloc -I/builds/worker/workspace/build/src/obj-firefox/xpcom -I/builds/worker/workspace/build/src/memory/build -I/builds/worker/workspace/build/src/obj-firefox/dist/include -I/builds/worker/workspace/build/src/obj-firefox/dist/include/nspr -I/builds/worker/workspace/build/src/obj-firefox/dist/include/nss -fPIC -DMOZILLA_CLIENT -include /builds/worker/workspace/build/src/obj-firefox/mozilla-config.h -Wall -Wempty-body -Wignored-qualifiers -Woverloaded-virtual -Wpointer-arith -Wsign-compare -Wtype-limits -Wunreachable-code -Wwrite-strings -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wduplicated-cond -Wno-error=maybe-uninitialized -Wno-error=deprecated-declarations -Wno-error=array-bounds -Wno-error=free-nonheap-object -Wformat -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0 -fno-sized-deallocation -msse -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -fno-exceptions -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-rtti -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fno-exceptions -fno-math-errno -pthread -pipe -g -fno-omit-frame-pointer -Werror -MD -MP -MF .deps/mozalloc_abort.o.pp /builds/worker/workspace/build/src/memory/mozalloc/mozalloc_abort.cpp I think what this indicates is just that --disable-optimize builds take longer for some reason, so sccache is hitting its idle timeout and quitting and so we lose the stats. sccache has an `SCCACHE_IDLE_TIMEOUT` option that glandium added which can be used to work around this, we're using it to work around the fact that clang takes forever to compile one source file for Android builds: https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/a6f5fb18e6bcc9bffe4a0209a22d8a25510936be/taskcluster/ci/build/android.yml#62 Maybe you can do a try push with `SCCACHE_IDLE_TIMEOUT=0` in the environment to avoid that so we get more sensible stats? As a sanity check, I downloaded sccache.log.gz from that linux x86 debug build, and we do have some cache hits there (mostly Rust compilations): $ rg 'Cache miss' sccache.log | wc -l 3339 $ rg 'Cache hit' sccache.log | wc -l 277
Also, looking at sccache.log from a recent mingw32 debug build on inbound: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=mozilla-inbound&selectedJob=167436147 $ rg 'Cache miss' sccache.log | wc -l 4 $ rg 'Cache hit' sccache.log | wc -l 3466 ...so it doesn't look like we're failing to use sccache here.
I noticed that mingw builds take forever to link, I wouldn't be surprised if that hits the sccache timeout.
Setting SCCACHE_IDLE_TIMEOUT=0 causes a build failure https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=a08ea6bc55b7a85ea7f95d6783fccb5f1ec40d6c&selectedJob=167522334 > # Terminate any sccache server that might still be around. > /builds/worker/workspace/build/src/sccache2/sccache --stop-server >> /builds/worker/workspace/build/src/obj-firefox/dist/sccache-orig.log 2>&1 > # Start a new server, ensuring it gets the jobserver file descriptors > # from make (but don't use the + prefix when make -n is used, so that > # the command doesn't run in that case) > env RUST_LOG=sccache::compiler=debug SCCACHE_ERROR_LOG=/builds/worker/workspace/build/src/obj-firefox/dist/sccache.log /builds/worker/workspace/build/src/sccache2/sccache --start-server > Starting sccache server... > error: Server startup error > caused by: Server startup failed: 1 > client.mk:80: recipe for target 'build' failed Here's the output of the shutdown: > $ cat sccache-orig.log > Stopping sccache server... > Compile requests 287 > Compile requests executed 156 > Cache hits 26 > Cache misses 78 > Cache timeouts 0 > Cache read errors 0 > Forced recaches 0 > Cache write errors 0 > Compilation failures 9 > Cache errors 43 > Non-cacheable compilations 0 > Non-cacheable calls 26 > Non-compilation calls 105 > Unsupported compiler calls 0 > Average cache write 0.039 s > Average cache read miss 0.052 s > Average cache read hit 0.043 s > Cache location S3, bucket: Bucket(name=taskcluster-level-1-sccache-us-east-1, base_url=http://taskcluster-level-1-sccache-us-east-1.s3.amazonaws.com/) And of the error: > $ cat /builds/worker/workspace/build/src/obj-firefox/dist/sccache.log > error: Address already in use (os error 98)
Oh right, tomprince fixed that in sccache but we haven't updated to pick up that fix: https://github.com/mozilla/sccache/pull/211
I filed bug 1445218 to try out updating to sccache 0.2.6 which has that fix.
2 years ago
Depends on: 1445218
0.2.6 and SCCACHE_IDLE_TIMEOUT=0 seems to solve the problem https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=22160a5c671f6cb423346323e83884b6fba514b9 > /builds/worker/workspace/build/src/sccache2/sccache --show-stats > Compile requests 3795 > Compile requests executed 3623 > Cache hits 335 > Cache misses 3288 What would be the best thing to do here? Detect --disable-optimize and up the Idle Timeout?
Actually I was thinking that the best fix would be to make sccache persist its stats to disk. We can then just explicitly run `sccache --zero-stats` after starting the server so we get fresh stats per-build.
Weird. A retrigger of the build job on that try run had the same hit rate. > Compile requests 3795 > Compile requests executed 3623 > Cache hits 334 > Cache misses 3289 Duration of 66 minutes vs the original 75.
That is strange! I would expect it to be near-100% on cache hits. I'll see if the logs have anything interesting.
Your retrigger gets a near 100% hit rate. > Compile requests 3795 > Compile requests executed 3623 > Cache hits 3607 > Cache misses 16 The runtime: 58 minutes. Compared to 66 or 75 with a very low hit rate. So whatever is happening to make the build slow, it's not really sccache.
It looks like host programs are being built without optimization, which I think would explain things: [task 2018-03-13T16:14:20.821Z] 16:14:20 INFO - /builds/worker/workspace/build/src/sccache2/sccache /builds/worker/workspace/build/src/gcc/bin/gcc -m32 -march=pentium-m -std=gnu99 -o host_pathsub.o -c -DXP_UNIX -DDEBUG=1 -D_UNICODE -DUNICODE -I/builds/worker/workspace/build/src/config -I/builds/worker/workspace/build/src/obj-firefox/config -I/builds/worker/workspace/build/src/obj-firefox/dist/include -MD -MP -MF .deps/host_pathsub.o.pp -I/builds/worker/workspace/build/src/obj-firefox/dist/include/nspr /builds/worker/workspace/build/src/config/pathsub.c I had checked this on my local --disable-optimize build and thought it looked sensible, but I must have been looking at a bad example, because: /home/luser/.cargo/bin/sccache /usr/bin/gcc -std=gnu99 -o host_pathsub.o -c -DXP_UNIX -DDEBUG=1 -D_UNICODE -DUNICODE -I/build/mozilla-central/config -I/build/debug-mozilla-central/config -I/build/debug-mozilla-central/dist/include -MD -MP -MF .deps/host_pathsub.o.pp -I/build/debug-mozilla-central/dist/include/nspr /build/mozilla-central/config/pathsub.c We have a separate `HOST_OPTIMIZE_FLAGS`: https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/6ff60a083701d08c52702daf50f28e8f46ae3a1c/old-configure.in#730 And we're supposed to honor them, but maybe this isn't working as intended: https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/6ff60a083701d08c52702daf50f28e8f46ae3a1c/python/mozbuild/mozbuild/frontend/context.py#347 I note that in the non-cross-compile case, we'll honor `MOZ_OPTIMIZE`, which doesn't seem right. We should always build host programs with optimization, regardless of the state of `--disable-optimize`. Unrelated, but I noticed in the build log that the mingw builds have: --host=i686-pc-linux which seems odd. Do we need that for some reason, or could they just build 64-bit binaries?
Summary: sccache doesn't work when --disable-optimize is specified → --disable-optimize makes host programs get compiled without optimize flags
Hm, on a recent MinGW win32 build I see the optimization flags: > /builds/worker/workspace/build/src/sccache2/sccache /bin/gcc -std=gnu99 -o host_pathsub.o -c -DXP_UNIX -O3 -DDEBUG=1 -D_UNICODE -DUNICODE -I/builds/worker/workspace/build/src/config -I/builds/worker/workspace/build/src/obj-firefox/config -I/builds/worker/workspace/build/src/obj-firefox/dist/include -MD -MP -MF .deps/host_pathsub.o.pp -I/builds/worker/workspace/build/src/obj-firefox/dist/include/nspr /builds/worker/workspace/build/src/config/pathsub.c > > /builds/worker/workspace/build/src/obj-firefox/_virtualenv/bin/python /builds/worker/workspace/build/src/config/expandlibs_exec.py -- /builds/worker/workspace/build/src/sccache2/sccache /bin/gcc -std=gnu99 -o nsinstall_real -DXP_UNIX -O3 host_nsinstall.o host_pathsub.o And on a MinGW win64 build I see the same thing. https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=395b1a6e68a3752cdc56333191e9d091026bd3e7&selectedJob=170963246 (That job timed out, but the optimize flags are still there)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.