Closed
Bug 1430818
Opened 8 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
Crash in URIUtils::ResetWithSource
Categories
(Core :: XSLT, defect, P2)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla61
People
(Reporter: philipp, Assigned: peterv)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: crash, regression)
Crash Data
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
|
6.07 KB,
patch
|
bzbarsky
:
review+
jcristau
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
This bug was filed from the Socorro interface and is
report bp-a4adffbb-8507-4c63-91b3-9fa440180115.
=============================================================
Top 10 frames of crashing thread:
0 xul.dll URIUtils::ResetWithSource dom/xslt/base/txURIUtils.cpp:48
1 xul.dll txMozillaXSLTProcessor::notifyError dom/xslt/xslt/txMozillaXSLTProcessor.cpp:1122
2 xul.dll txMozillaXSLTProcessor::SetSourceContentModel dom/xslt/xslt/txMozillaXSLTProcessor.cpp:384
3 xul.dll nsXMLContentSink::DidBuildModel dom/xml/nsXMLContentSink.cpp:297
4 xul.dll nsParser::DidBuildModel parser/htmlparser/nsParser.cpp:491
5 xul.dll nsParser::ResumeParse parser/htmlparser/nsParser.cpp:1101
6 xul.dll nsParser::OnStopRequest parser/htmlparser/nsParser.cpp:1475
7 xul.dll nsDocumentOpenInfo::OnStopRequest uriloader/base/nsURILoader.cpp:357
8 xul.dll nsBaseChannel::OnStopRequest netwerk/base/nsBaseChannel.cpp:878
9 xul.dll nsInputStreamPump::OnStateStop netwerk/base/nsInputStreamPump.cpp:704
=============================================================
this is a low volume content crash signature newly appearing in 58.0b16 & 59.0a1.
Flags: needinfo?(peterv)
Updated•8 years ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•8 years ago
|
||
Might be a regressions from bug 1387427. Probably only happens with an error in an XSLT stylesheet.
Updated•8 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P2
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 4•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 5•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•8 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8954675 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8956751 -
Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Comment 7•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8956751 [details] [diff] [review]
v1.1
So the actual fix is redundant with the fix for bug 1436040, right? That is, that patch will fix this bug as well. All that's left here is the testcase and assert fix?
r=me with the commit message adjusted accordingly. If this lands first, then the commit message should say "We want to create the source fragment before trying to use ...", I would think.
Attachment #8956751 -
Flags: review?(bzbarsky) → review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 8•8 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Boris Zbarsky [:bz] (no decent commit message means r-) from comment #7)
> So the actual fix is redundant with the fix for bug 1436040, right? That
> is, that patch will fix this bug as well. All that's left here is the
> testcase and assert fix?
Well, actually, bug 1436040 applies on top of this.
Comment 9•8 years ago
|
||
Oh, I see. OK, then please adjust per something like the wording at the end of comment 7.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 10•8 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/3c3dd78b460b4449ec3935eaaf1f203af93511bb
Bug 1430818 - Crash in URIUtils::ResetWithSource. r=bz.
Comment 11•8 years ago
|
||
| bugherder | ||
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
status-firefox61:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla61
Comment 12•8 years ago
|
||
Should we uplift this to beta60?
Updated•8 years ago
|
Flags: in-testsuite+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 13•7 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8956751 [details] [diff] [review]
v1.1
Approval Request Comment
[Feature/Bug causing the regression]: bug 1387427
[User impact if declined]: crash
[Is this code covered by automated tests?]: yes
[Has the fix been verified in Nightly?]: yes
[Needs manual test from QE? If yes, steps to reproduce]: no
[List of other uplifts needed for the feature/fix]: none
[Is the change risky?]: no
[Why is the change risky/not risky?]: just makes sure we create an object before trying to use it
[String changes made/needed]: none
Flags: needinfo?(peterv)
Attachment #8956751 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Comment 14•7 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8956751 [details] [diff] [review]
v1.1
crash fix, approved for 60.0b14
Attachment #8956751 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta? → approval-mozilla-beta+
Comment 15•7 years ago
|
||
| bugherder uplift | ||
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•