Closed Bug 1441063 Opened 7 years ago Closed 7 years ago

Misleading bugzilla comment when asking for re-review

Categories

(Conduit :: Phabricator, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: mt, Assigned: zalun)

References

()

Details

(Keywords: conduit-backlog, conduit-triaged)

Attachments

(1 obsolete file)

STR: 1. Ask for review 2. Get r+ conditional on "small" tweaks 3. Discover problem that requires a non-trivial fix 4. Post larger fix and "Request Review" using the phab UI Expected: Remove r+ A message saying as much Actual: Remove r+ (good) A very misleading message: <reviewer name> has been removed from the revision. Example: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1309068#c7
Can we have something clearer for this type of situation, do you think?
Flags: needinfo?(dkl)
(In reply to Mark Côté [:mcote] from comment #1) > Can we have something clearer for this type of situation, do you think? Yeah I will take a look at it. It is a matter of what we can get from the Phabricator API as to what thing happened and put the proper comment in BMO for that. dkl
Assignee: nobody → dkl
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Flags: needinfo?(dkl)
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Keywords: conduit-triaged
Whiteboard: [phabricator-backlog]
Assignee: dkl → pzalewa
Attachment #8962710 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Keywords: conduit-backlog
Whiteboard: [phabricator-backlog]
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: