Closed
Bug 1463327
Opened 6 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
Reorganize scope of methods of EditorBase, TextEditor and HTMLEditor
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Editor, enhancement)
Core
DOM: Editor
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla62
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox62 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: masayuki, Assigned: masayuki)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
Attachments
(4 files)
Currently, some public methods but not inherited from nsI*Editor may be referred from: - classes handling comment - *EditRules class - *Transaction class - WSRunObject class Actual external call is only the first case. And some of those classes are already friend of the editor classes. At implementing InputEvent.inputType, editor classes need to store top level input type when public methods called from external. Therefore, for making editor classes safer, public methods which are called only by internal classes of editor should be private or protected but they should be explicitly documented which can be called by internal classes.
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=1bf707b094a7fef3942e49ffaa93c78b3a5bf6d9
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•6 years ago
|
||
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=d48e935b41d32a91a1d00a6c8ab667f407caa815
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•6 years ago
|
||
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=aaa49fcfd9a6beedb3129f43c2c6687731c705bf
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment 9•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8979925 [details] Bug 1463327 - part 1: Change scope of some methods of EditorBase which won't be called by non-helper classes of editing to protected https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/246116/#review252422 ::: editor/libeditor/HTMLStyleEditor.cpp:1054 (Diff revision 1) > break; > } > > // just ignore any non-editable nodes > if (content->GetAsText() && (!IsEditable(content) || > - IsEmptyTextNode(this, content))) { > + IsEmptyTextNode(*content))) { Since GetAsText is true, this can replace IsEmptyTextNode with IsEmptyNode.
Attachment #8979925 -
Flags: review?(m_kato) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review-reply |
Comment on attachment 8979925 [details] Bug 1463327 - part 1: Change scope of some methods of EditorBase which won't be called by non-helper classes of editing to protected https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/246116/#review252422 > Since GetAsText is true, this can replace IsEmptyTextNode with IsEmptyNode. Hmm, yes, but IsEmptyNode() requires out param. Perhaps, we should sort out around IsEmptyNode() first (bug 1359404).
Comment 11•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8979926 [details] Bug 1463327 - part 2: Change scope of some methods of TextEditor which won't be called by non-helper classes of editing to protected https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/246118/#review252460
Attachment #8979926 -
Flags: review?(m_kato) → review+
Comment 12•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8979927 [details] Bug 1463327 - part 3: Change scope of some methods of HTMLEditor which won't be called by non-helper classes of editing to protected https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/246120/#review252424 ::: editor/libeditor/HTMLEditor.h:116 (Diff revision 1) > + > + bool GetReturnInParagraphCreatesNewParagraph(); > + Element* GetSelectionContainer(); > + > + // nsISelectionListener overrides > + NS_DECL_NSISELECTIONLISTENER Why doesn't NS_DECL_NSISELECTIONLISTENER move to previous HTMLEditor() define? ::: editor/libeditor/HTMLEditor.h:120 (Diff revision 1) > + // nsISelectionListener overrides > + NS_DECL_NSISELECTIONLISTENER > > - // Miscellaneous > + // nsICSSLoaderObserver > + NS_IMETHOD StyleSheetLoaded(StyleSheet* aSheet, > + bool aWasAlternate, nsresult aStatus) override; Why doesn't nsICSSLoaderObserver's overload move to previous HTMLEditor() define?
Attachment #8979927 -
Flags: review?(m_kato) → review+
Comment 13•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8979928 [details] Bug 1463327 - part 4: Add comments to explain which kind of methods should be public methods https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/246122/#review252466
Attachment #8979928 -
Flags: review?(m_kato) → review+
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment 18•6 years ago
|
||
Pushed by masayuki@d-toybox.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/5c9278b7b027 part 1: Change scope of some methods of EditorBase which won't be called by non-helper classes of editing to protected r=m_kato https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/f0cb4203b12d part 2: Change scope of some methods of TextEditor which won't be called by non-helper classes of editing to protected r=m_kato https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/5d7484ed3b99 part 3: Change scope of some methods of HTMLEditor which won't be called by non-helper classes of editing to protected r=m_kato https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/ac00527001f9 part 4: Add comments to explain which kind of methods should be public methods r=m_kato
Comment 19•6 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/5c9278b7b027 https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/f0cb4203b12d https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/5d7484ed3b99 https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/ac00527001f9
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 6 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla62
Assignee | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Blocks: redesign-editor-module
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•