Closed
Bug 149022
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 21 years ago
Dragging proxy icon onto bookmarks icon causes bookmark to diappear.
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Copy & Paste and Drag & Drop, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: jon, Assigned: bugzilla)
References
Details
(Keywords: dataloss)
Although bug #96504 has been fixed, and bug #148996 has been created to re-enable the feature on the trunk, with the intermediate fix for 1.0, if I drag the proxy icon onto the bookmarks button, the bookmark disappears, where-as it should presumably be added to the bookmarks menu or (preferably) be left where it is?
See also Bug 135983. According to Pierre, it's fixed on the trunk by his fix for Bug 139471 (see Bug 135983 Comment 1, Bug 139471 Comment 41). But maybe you want different behavior than what that fix provides (I don't even know what the behavior is, and I'm away from my computer)? If you really want a bookmark dragged and dropped on the bookmarks button to "(preferably) be left where it is", then I'll do you one better: there should be a crossed out circle (negative feedback, "you can't drop that here") for DnD bookmark or location bar proxy icons over the bookmarks button on the PT. This is probably better than giving positive feedback then doing nothing, don't you think?
Summary: Dragging proxy icon onto bookmarks icon causes bookmark to diappear. → Dragging proxy icon onto bookmarks icon causes bookmark to diappear.
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•22 years ago
|
||
I'm not sure that bug #135983 is relevant, I /think/ there are separate problems in linux and Windows? (bug #96504 was a linux bug).
I see your point, but I see it works fine in Linux (nightly build 2002060308). So what you want is for this to work in in 1.0 also?
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•22 years ago
|
||
I'd like it to work in the 1.0 branch e.g. 1.0.1
Comment 6•22 years ago
|
||
Jon: can you reproduce this with 1.1beta?
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•22 years ago
|
||
No, it work's fine in the trunk and the new 1.1 branch I was originally hoping it would be fixed in 1.0.1 and that branch to, that was the point of this bug but I guess it's unlikely. Do you think I should resolve it "invalid"?
Comment 8•22 years ago
|
||
if a problem has gone without knowing why it's WFM
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•22 years ago
|
||
Kai: You don't seem to understand what I'm writing! This bug is not present in the trunk or the 1.1 branch because bug #96504 has been fixed. I thought that patch or a similar one should be checked into the long-lived stable 1.0.x branch so that 1.0.1, 1.0.2 etc will not have this dataloss bug. The latest nightly 1.0 build (I just checked today) still displays this bug so the resolution of this bug is *NOT* WFM.
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: WORKSFORME → ---
Comment 10•22 years ago
|
||
By the definitions on <http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/bug_status.html#severity> and <http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?format=guided>, crashing and dataloss bugs are of critical or possibly higher severity. Only changing open bugs to minimize unnecessary spam. Keywords to trigger this would be crash, topcrash, topcrash+, zt4newcrash, dataloss.
Severity: normal → critical
Updated•21 years ago
|
Blocks: bookmark-loss
Comment 11•21 years ago
|
||
closed as WFM ... cause 1.4 will be the new stable branch ... won't fixed in the 1.0 branch (the version flag should be change, if something should only repaired in branch instead of trunk).
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago → 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•