Open
Bug 1496285
Opened 7 years ago
Updated 3 years ago
Fix differences between JSDCOV and JSVM in coverage of XML files
Categories
(Testing :: Code Coverage, defect, P3)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
NEW
People
(Reporter: sparky, Unassigned)
References
(Depends on 1 open bug, Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
|
13.80 KB,
text/plain
|
Details |
Looking at the raw data from these two pushes:
JSDCOV: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&selectedJob=201089393&revision=f90b8cdb2cefb9e39f37db54415645df0055ae69
JSVM: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&selectedJob=201089393&revision=22abb99d81005498bf86ec6cd896fb1c5e6c8fcf
I've attached the coverage for the XML files as an attachment. This bug is to look into the differences, and file bugs to ensure JSVM has the same coverage of XML files as JSDCOV coverage.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•7 years ago
|
||
Links were backwards:
> JSVM:
> https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/
> jobs?repo=try&selectedJob=201089393&revision=f90b8cdb2cefb9e39f37db54415645df
> 0055ae69
>
> JSDCOV:
> https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/
> jobs?repo=try&selectedJob=201089393&revision=22abb99d81005498bf86ec6cd896fb1c
> 5e6c8fcf
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
I wonder if we can still run JSDCOV to check again if there is some coverage in JSDCOV which is not in JSVM.
Priority: -- → P3
Updated•3 years ago
|
Severity: normal → S3
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•