Hide local system clock message if update ping date matches the current date
Categories
(Firefox :: Security, enhancement, P3)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: ekr, Assigned: gaurijove, Mentored)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
Attachments
(2 files)
Bug 1500464: Hide local system clock message if update ping date matches the current date. r=johannh
47 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
Details | Review | |
47 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
Details | Review |
Comment 1•6 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 3•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 4•6 years ago
|
||
You can try this on https://expired.badssl.com/
Even though the system clock is correct, the error page shows the date and suggests fixing it. We can be a bit smarter about it, because we have some server information about the date, precisely the date difference and when the cert was last fetched.
We use it here: https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/dc0adc07db3df9431a0876156f50c65d580010cb/browser/actors/NetErrorChild.jsm#483-486
To complete this bug, we should find out
a) Is the server difference less than a day
b) Was the date last fetched less than 5 days ago
and then we should probably show this text instead of the existing warning: https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/dc0adc07db3df9431a0876156f50c65d580010cb/browser/locales/en-US/chrome/overrides/netError.dtd#179
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 5•6 years ago
|
||
Hi Johann,
Phoenix here.
I would like to begin work on this.
Comment 6•6 years ago
|
||
Great, let me know if you need any help!
Comment 7•6 years ago
|
||
Hey @johannh,I have a PR ready for this. Can I take this up as there is no activity from @PhoenixAbhishek?
Comment 8•6 years ago
|
||
Hi @srestha
Actually I am still on this, but if you already have a patch to fix this, I think it will be better to go ahead with that, as long as @johannh has another bug I can work on :)
@johannh, I am sorry for not updating on this one. I'll like to know on how to proceed here :)
Comment 9•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to PhoenixAbhishek from comment #8)
Hi @srestha
Actually I am still on this, but if you already have a patch to fix this, I think it will be better to go ahead with that, as long as @johannh has another bug I can work on :)
It's up to you. If you say that you'd rather not want to work on this bug, I'm happy to re-assign it. Would you like to look into bug 1521919?
@johannh, I am sorry for not updating on this one. I'll like to know on how to proceed here :)
What exactly are you stuck on?
Comment 10•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Johann Hofmann [:johannh] from comment #9)
It's up to you. If you say that you'd rather not want to work on this bug, I'm happy to re-assign it. Would you like to look into bug 1521919?
I've looked at the bug, and would like to work on it.
What exactly are you stuck on?
Actually I has issues with my build and it took time to resolve those.
Comment 11•6 years ago
|
||
Feel free to post your patch, Srestha.
Comment 12•6 years ago
|
||
Hi Johann, Can I please work on this?
Comment 13•6 years ago
|
||
Sure!
Comment 14•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 15•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 16•5 years ago
|
||
Unassigning due to inactivity. Let me know if you want to pick this up again.
Updated•5 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•5 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•5 years ago
|
||
Submitted a patch. Do review and submit changes :)
Comment 19•5 years ago
|
||
Comment 20•5 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Updated•5 years ago
|
Description
•