151861 - text incorrectly wrapped over itself -> unreadable

Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 148399

(Core :: Layout, defect)

Description

[Daniel Steinberger]

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.1a) Gecko/20020614
BuildID:    2002061404

while testing some JNGs (and finding out that we don't support ICC color
profiles for MNG [bug 44866]) i found an error: some text in <b>-tags was
incorrectly wrapped over itself and so became unreadable. this is really bad.
depends on the width of the browserwindow.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. load URL (http://www.libmng.com/JNGsuite/anke_diff_img.html)
2. scroll down to the last series of pictures. above it says "...that your
software does not handle..."
3. resize window to ~870px width while still seeing the mentioned text
(4. if nessesary: rezise your window a little. first make it bigger and then
smaller again. note that the bold "not" first is correctly wrapped around while
the bold "does" is one line above. then you make the window more narrow and the
"not" is drawn uppon the "does"!)

Comment 1

[Daniel Steinberger]

Attachment: screenshot of the problem (15.8kb)

this screenshot demonstrates the problem. the text in the red circle should
read "does not".

Comment 2

[WD]

Related to bug 148399 ?

Comment 3

[R.K.Aa.]

WFM. current CVS, Linux (with fix for 148399)

Comment 4

[Daniel Steinberger]

well.. that seems to be timing... the fix for bug 148399 has been checked in
today.. so it is not in today's build.. but i'll check back.. uuhm.. monday...
and see if it fixed this one too and resolve it if it's gone.

Comment 5

[Daniel Steinberger]

cool. the fix for the links also works for other elements like (in this case)
<b> -  this was faster then expected *g*

Comment 6

[Andrew Schultz]

.

Comment 7

[Andrew Schultz]

text overlaps when it should wrap + dependent on window size = dupe of bug 148399

(FIXED applies only to bugs that can point to a specific patch)

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 148399 ***

Comment 8

[Moied]

Verified -