Worker Manager should be able to sort by last-seen, task-state, last-resolved
Categories
(Taskcluster :: Services, enhancement)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
People
(Reporter: jlund, Unassigned)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
this would be an improvement over current explorer UI.
Updated•6 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 1•6 years ago
|
||
I started working on the new worker manager ui, and I'd like some clarification here. Is the requested the requested functionality for lists of the worker types? Am I guessing the meaning of the columns correctly:
last-seen - last time a worker of this type was active,
task-state - number of failed tasks,
last-resolved - last time when a task was resolved
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to [:owlish] from comment #1)
I started working on the new worker manager ui, and I'd like some clarification here. Is the requested the requested functionality for lists of the worker types? Am I guessing the meaning of the columns correctly:
Thanks for this!
task-state - number of failed tasks,
I believe what we would like is a way to be able to sort by all types of non success/green. So exception, retry, failed etc.
Similar to bug 1518928, I will be on leave until June 12th. Could you please reach out to Danut Labici for further user input / questions regarding this bug? I've cc'd the ciduty team account to this bug
Comment 3•5 years ago
|
||
@owlish does this block the tc-cloudops migration?
Comment 4•5 years ago
|
||
[I duplicate this answer in the two similar tickets] Currently, I don't work on the UI because AWS provider is prioritized. I will return to the worker manager UI once I'm done with AWS provider. I don't think this blocks tc-cloudops migration.... However, maybe if you give me some background info on what prompted you to ask this question (i.e. what makes you think this might be blocking tc-migration; or to rephrase further, what are possible ways this can block the migration), I might be able to give more definitive answer
Updated•5 years ago
|
Comment 5•5 years ago
|
||
It's in the dependency tree for the "tc-cloudops" bug, is why I ask. I can fix that up. The way it might block the migration is my representing an existing functionality that users would lose during the migration if the bug isn't completed. I agree that it doesn't block the migration.
Updated•5 years ago
|
Comment 6•4 years ago
|
||
Description
•