1518934 - Crash in mozilla::widget::WaylandShmPool::CreateTemporaryFile

Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 1543687

(Core :: Widget: Gtk, defect)

Description

[Marcia Knous [:marcia]]

This bug was filed from the Socorro interface and is
report bp-dedda2d3-13d9-497f-bd48-4ca250181213.

Seen while looking at nightly crash data. Linux crashes started when nightly was in 65: https://bit.ly/2AGkO8O. 6 crashes/6 installs in the last 2 weeks.

ni on :stranksy since it appears he worked in this area.

Top 10 frames of crashing thread:

0 libxul.so mozilla::widget::WaylandShmPool::CreateTemporaryFile widget/gtk/WindowSurfaceWayland.cpp:180
1 libxul.so mozilla::widget::WaylandShmPool::WaylandShmPool widget/gtk/WindowSurfaceWayland.cpp:187
2 libxul.so mozilla::widget::WindowBackBuffer::WindowBackBuffer widget/gtk/WindowSurfaceWayland.cpp:273
3 libxul.so mozilla::widget::WindowSurfaceWayland::GetWaylandBufferToDraw widget/gtk/WindowSurfaceWayland.cpp:386
4 libxul.so mozilla::widget::WindowSurfaceWayland::LockWaylandBuffer widget/gtk/WindowSurfaceWayland.cpp:446
5 libxul.so mozilla::widget::WindowSurfaceWayland::Lock widget/gtk/WindowSurfaceWayland.cpp:506
6 libxul.so mozilla::widget::WindowSurfaceProvider::StartRemoteDrawingInRegion widget/gtk/WindowSurfaceProvider.cpp:114
7 libxul.so mozilla::layers::BasicCompositor::BeginFrame gfx/layers/basic/BasicCompositor.cpp:850
8 libxul.so mozilla::layers::LayerManagerComposite::EndTransaction gfx/layers/composite/LayerManagerComposite.cpp:887
9 libxul.so mozilla::layers::CompositorBridgeParent::CompositeToTarget gfx/layers/ipc/CompositorBridgeParent.cpp:993

=============================================================

Comment 1

[Martin Stránský [:stransky] (ni? me)]

Okay, Thanks!

Comment 2

[Martin Stránský [:stransky] (ni? me)]

I think it's because there's no space left at tmp to create the mapping file. But let's produce a better diagnose for that - Bug 1519355

Comment 3

[Jared Wein [:jaws] (please needinfo? me)]

Martin do you think you will now be able to fix this with bug 1519355 fixed or should we mark 65 as wontfix, considering we're running out of time for uplifts for 65.

Comment 4

[Martin Stránský [:stransky] (ni? me)]

It should be marked as wontfix, I don't see any new crashes with this signature. I'll investigate it if there's anything new.

Comment 5

[Neha Kochar [:neha]]

Martin, there are crash signatures from Feb 28 to Mar 3. Can you please look into this for the 67 soft freeze (Mar 11)?

Comment 6

[Martin Stránský [:stransky] (ni? me)]

Unfortunately there's nothing new at the reports, I may need to put more debugging info/logging to the failure.

Comment 7

[Martin Stránský [:stransky] (ni? me)]

Let's handle it at Bug 1543687.