Closed Bug 1519847 Opened 6 years ago Closed 6 years ago

[css-logical] Implement the padding-block/inline shorthands

Categories

(Core :: CSS Parsing and Computation, enhancement, P3)

enhancement

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla66
Tracking Status
firefox66 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: MatsPalmgren_bugz, Assigned: MatsPalmgren_bugz)

Details

(Keywords: dev-doc-complete)

Attachments

(1 file)

Comment on attachment 9036320 [details] [diff] [review] [css-logical] Implement the padding-block/inline shorthands Review of attachment 9036320 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- r=me, please do send an intent to implement / ship to dev-platform. Thanks! (And sorry for the lag with the other reviews, I need to find some time to go through all of them :/) ::: servo/components/style/properties/shorthands/padding.mako.rs @@ +27,5 @@ > + input: &mut Parser<'i, 't>, > + ) -> Result<Longhands, ParseError<'i>> { > + let start_value = NonNegativeLengthPercentage::parse(context, input)?; > + let end_value = > + input.try(|input| NonNegativeLengthPercentage::parse(context, input)).unwrap_or(start_value.clone()); nit: unwrap_or_else(|| start_value.clone()) avoids the copy if you specify both values. @@ +38,5 @@ > + > + impl<'a> ToCss for LonghandsToSerialize<'a> { > + fn to_css<W>(&self, dest: &mut CssWriter<W>) -> fmt::Result where W: fmt::Write { > + self.padding_${axis}_start.to_css(dest)?; > + nit: Please remove the trailing whitespace. @@ +43,5 @@ > + if self.padding_${axis}_end != self.padding_${axis}_start { > + dest.write_str(" ")?; > + self.padding_${axis}_end.to_css(dest)?; > + } > + nit: And here. ::: testing/web-platform/meta/css/css-logical/logical-box-padding.html.ini @@ +2,1 @@ > [Test that padding shorthand sets longhands and serializes correctly.] Why are these still failing? Do they test the computed style serialization of the shorthands or something? If so, it'd be good to add `bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137688` to these lines.
Attachment #9036320 - Flags: review?(emilio) → review+

.unwrap_or_else(|| start_value.clone());
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ -- takes 0 arguments
|
expected closure that takes 1 argument

So, is |_| the way to solve that?

Flags: needinfo?(emilio)

Yup, sorry. unwrap_or_else on Option<T> takes no arguments, on Result<T, E> takes the error, which in this case we ignore, so _ is the right thing to signal that.

Flags: needinfo?(emilio)
Pushed by mpalmgren@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/c15d04c80f5b [css-logical] Implement the padding-block/inline shorthands. r=emilio
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 6 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla66
Keywords: dev-doc-needed
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: