[remote-dbg-next] devtools/shared/adb should own the logic to find correct binary
Categories
(DevTools :: about:debugging, enhancement, P3)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
People
(Reporter: jdescottes, Unassigned)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
(Whiteboard: remote-debugging-technical-debt)
Spawned from https://github.com/mozilla/devtools-adb-extension/pull/15
We are currently very strict in the list of platforms supported for ADB. There is a json file in the addon that describes which platform should use which binaries:
{
"Linux": {
"x86": [
"linux/adb"
],
"x86_64": [
"linux64/adb"
]
},
"Darwin": {
"x86_64": [
"mac64/adb"
]
},
"WINNT": {
"x86": [
"win32/adb.exe",
"win32/AdbWinApi.dll",
"win32/AdbWinUsbApi.dll"
],
"x86_64": [
"win32/adb.exe",
"win32/AdbWinApi.dll",
"win32/AdbWinUsbApi.dll"
]
}
}
And we expect the strings above (WINNT, x86_64,....) to match exactly the information we get about the current OS when we unpack ADB:
However in practice we have 4 flavors of the binaries: linux32, linux64, macos and windows. The addon should probably still describe which binaries are available, but there should be a mapping logic in our devtools module.
We should be able to say "windows" and "aarch64" ? -> use the windows binary ; without hardcoding new mappings in the addon.
Reporter | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 1•6 years ago
|
||
is there an eta for this landing?
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
It is not a priority for us at the moment, but if it breaks on infra I can land a simple workaround. Do you have instructions so that I can test my changes on try?
Comment 3•6 years ago
|
||
we will have access to try in 2-3 weeks time (waiting on machines to be available), if this will be deployed by then, no worries. If we get try access sooner we can follow up in this bug.
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•6 years ago
|
||
filter on: remote-debugging-m2-reserve-cleanup
Comment 5•6 years ago
|
||
Following up on this bug for movement.
General try access to the windows10-aarch64 machines are under testing, and may come before or on first week of March. We are ready to test any changes that are made for this bug.
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•6 years ago
|
||
We landed an initial fix in Bug 1524731 to unblock the failing test in aarch64 platforms. After this fix, we still have a complex JSON file in the addon + some logic in the adb-binaries module in m-c to accommodate for aarch64. The goal of this bug is to simplify the JSON file and move all the logic to adb-binaries to pick the right binary for a given OS+architecture pair.
Renaming the bug, since basic aarch64 support is now fixed.
Updated•2 years ago
|
Description
•