Generate crash correlations for Fenix
Categories
(Socorro :: Webapp, task)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
People
(Reporter: marcia, Unassigned)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
Maybe this is expected, but right now Fenix doesn't show in the correlations dropdown.
Comment 1•5 years ago
|
||
Marco: Do we generate correlations for Fenix? I'm pretty sure we don't, but I think the values in that dropdown is hard-coded in Crash Stats so if we did, I should add it.
Comment 2•5 years ago
|
||
We are not generating them yet.
Do we need them for both Firefox for Android and Fenix? Or should we generate them only for Fenix?
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•5 years ago
|
||
Marco - I can see correlations already on the Firefox for Android side. So I think they are just needed for Fenix.
Updated•5 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•5 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Marco Castelluccio [:marco] (PTO until August 30) from comment #2)
We are not generating them yet.
Do we need them for both Firefox for Android and Fenix? Or should we generate them only for Fenix?
Hi Marco - Are any closer to having correlations yet? Thanks.
Comment 5•5 years ago
|
||
I had to perform a migration of the job from ATMO (which is being deprecated) to Databricks. The migration is now done, so I can do this.
Two questions:
- Do we still want Fennec correlations, or should I stop collecting them?
- If the answer to 1 is "keep collecting", do we keep collecting correlations for nightly, beta and release, or just one of these channels?
- To add Fenix, I need a way to know the released Fenix versions. For Firefox and Fennec, I'm using respectively https://product-details.mozilla.org/1.0/firefox_versions.json and https://product-details.mozilla.org/1.0/mobile_versions.json, but Fenix does not seem to be on product details. Should I use Firefox versions for Fenix, or is there another data source?
Updated•5 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•5 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Marco Castelluccio [:marco] from comment #5)
I had to perform a migration of the job from ATMO (which is being deprecated) to Databricks. The migration is now done, so I can do this.
Two questions:
- Do we still want Fennec correlations, or should I stop collecting them?
- If the answer to 1 is "keep collecting", do we keep collecting correlations for nightly, beta and release, or just one of these channels?
- To add Fenix, I need a way to know the released Fenix versions. For Firefox and Fennec, I'm using respectively https://product-details.mozilla.org/1.0/firefox_versions.json and https://product-details.mozilla.org/1.0/mobile_versions.json, but Fenix does not seem to be on product details. Should I use Firefox versions for Fenix, or is there another data source?
(1) We definitely want to keep Fennec correlations.
Regarding the answers to (2) and (3), I asked the rest of Relman to weigh in via email. I will post when I get more information.
I dropped a note in release engineering team's design document for Fenix ship-it support to ensure we start documenting Fenix releases in product-details. JLund told me this is on the roadmap.
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•5 years ago
|
||
The answer to #2 is definitely yes as well.
Comment 9•5 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Ritu Kothari (:ritu) from comment #7)
I dropped a note in release engineering team's design document for Fenix ship-it support to ensure we start documenting Fenix releases in product-details. JLund told me this is on the roadmap.
Is there a bug for this, so I can set it as blocking this one?
Comment 10•5 years ago
|
||
we can use bug 1568466 for now. This tracks Fenix getting on shipit which also blocks adding product-details for Fenix.
Description
•