Open Bug 1555096 Opened 5 years ago Updated 11 months ago

Generate crash correlations for Fenix

Categories

(Socorro :: Webapp, task)

task
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

People

(Reporter: marcia, Unassigned)

References

(Blocks 1 open bug)

Details

Maybe this is expected, but right now Fenix doesn't show in the correlations dropdown.

Marco: Do we generate correlations for Fenix? I'm pretty sure we don't, but I think the values in that dropdown is hard-coded in Crash Stats so if we did, I should add it.

Flags: needinfo?(mcastelluccio)

We are not generating them yet.
Do we need them for both Firefox for Android and Fenix? Or should we generate them only for Fenix?

Flags: needinfo?(mcastelluccio)

Marco - I can see correlations already on the Firefox for Android side. So I think they are just needed for Fenix.

Summary: Unable to see any correlations for Fenix → Generate crash correlations for Fenix

(In reply to Marco Castelluccio [:marco] (PTO until August 30) from comment #2)

We are not generating them yet.
Do we need them for both Firefox for Android and Fenix? Or should we generate them only for Fenix?

Hi Marco - Are any closer to having correlations yet? Thanks.

Flags: needinfo?(mcastelluccio)

I had to perform a migration of the job from ATMO (which is being deprecated) to Databricks. The migration is now done, so I can do this.

Two questions:

  1. Do we still want Fennec correlations, or should I stop collecting them?
  2. If the answer to 1 is "keep collecting", do we keep collecting correlations for nightly, beta and release, or just one of these channels?
  3. To add Fenix, I need a way to know the released Fenix versions. For Firefox and Fennec, I'm using respectively https://product-details.mozilla.org/1.0/firefox_versions.json and https://product-details.mozilla.org/1.0/mobile_versions.json, but Fenix does not seem to be on product details. Should I use Firefox versions for Fenix, or is there another data source?
Flags: needinfo?(mcastelluccio)
Flags: needinfo?(mozillamarcia.knous)

(In reply to Marco Castelluccio [:marco] from comment #5)

I had to perform a migration of the job from ATMO (which is being deprecated) to Databricks. The migration is now done, so I can do this.

Two questions:

  1. Do we still want Fennec correlations, or should I stop collecting them?
  2. If the answer to 1 is "keep collecting", do we keep collecting correlations for nightly, beta and release, or just one of these channels?
  3. To add Fenix, I need a way to know the released Fenix versions. For Firefox and Fennec, I'm using respectively https://product-details.mozilla.org/1.0/firefox_versions.json and https://product-details.mozilla.org/1.0/mobile_versions.json, but Fenix does not seem to be on product details. Should I use Firefox versions for Fenix, or is there another data source?

(1) We definitely want to keep Fennec correlations.

Regarding the answers to (2) and (3), I asked the rest of Relman to weigh in via email. I will post when I get more information.

I dropped a note in release engineering team's design document for Fenix ship-it support to ensure we start documenting Fenix releases in product-details. JLund told me this is on the roadmap.

The answer to #2 is definitely yes as well.

Flags: needinfo?(mozillamarcia.knous)

(In reply to Ritu Kothari (:ritu) from comment #7)

I dropped a note in release engineering team's design document for Fenix ship-it support to ensure we start documenting Fenix releases in product-details. JLund told me this is on the roadmap.

Is there a bug for this, so I can set it as blocking this one?

Flags: needinfo?(jlund)

we can use bug 1568466 for now. This tracks Fenix getting on shipit which also blocks adding product-details for Fenix.

Depends on: 1568466
Flags: needinfo?(jlund)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.