Closed Bug 1563219 Opened 6 years ago Closed 6 years ago

Investigate late May retention gain

Categories

(Data Science :: Investigation, task)

x86_64
Unspecified
task
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: jmccrosky, Assigned: jmccrosky)

References

Details

Brief description of the request: Investigate early May retention gain.

Link to any assets:

Is there a specific data scientist you would like or someone who has helped to triage this request: Jesse will work on this.

Assignee: nobody → jmccrosky
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Summary: Investigate early May retention gain → Investigate late May retention gain

It appears that about half of the retention increase was attributable to the profile-per-install change and about half due to a decrease in the rate of single-day-profiles (profiles that only ever submit pings on a single day). I’m not sure why we’re seeing fewer single-day profiles. It could be that the some characteristic of 67 (performance improvements maybe?) is convincing people to keep using Firefox, but I’m skeptical that subtle improvements could drive such a significant retention increase. It might also be some artifact of how we’re controlling for the new profile-per-install profiles. I have a brief writeup here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/12S-43KquWA4WGkbhzL-y0AKySjDAGqIbU2MCW4oGfM4/

Closing this bug for now as I don't plan any further analysis of this.

Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 6 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.