1.31 - 2.14% startup_about_home_paint (linux64-shippable) regression on push d780672e184a445f70d63643fce313e75d5da3c9 (Fri August 2 2019)
Categories
(Firefox :: New Tab Page, defect, P1)
Tracking
()
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox-esr60 | --- | unaffected |
firefox-esr68 | --- | unaffected |
firefox68 | --- | unaffected |
firefox69 | --- | unaffected |
firefox70 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: marauder, Assigned: Mardak)
References
(Regression)
Details
(4 keywords)
Attachments
(1 file)
Talos has detected a Firefox performance regression from push:
As author of one of the patches included in that push, we need your help to address this regression.
Regressions:
2% startup_about_home_paint linux64-shippable opt e10s stylo 722.62 -> 738.08
1% startup_about_home_paint linux64-shippable opt e10s stylo 720.88 -> 730.33
You can find links to graphs and comparison views for each of the above tests at: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/alerts?id=22369
On the page above you can see an alert for each affected platform as well as a link to a graph showing the history of scores for this test. There is also a link to a treeherder page showing the Talos jobs in a pushlog format.
To learn more about the regressing test(s), please see: https://wiki.mozilla.org/TestEngineering/Performance/Talos
For information on reproducing and debugging the regression, either on try or locally, see: https://wiki.mozilla.org/TestEngineering/Performance/Talos/Running
*** Please let us know your plans within 3 business days, or the offending patch(es) will be backed out! ***
Our wiki page outlines the common responses and expectations: https://wiki.mozilla.org/TestEngineering/Performance/Talos/RegressionBugsHandling
Reporter | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Updated•5 years ago
|
Comment 1•5 years ago
|
||
This is likely caused by rendering extended triplets before top sites, let's take a look and see what the right thing to do here is.
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•5 years ago
|
||
Here's some quick runs of the export m-c commit:
https://perfht.ml/2ZXnFEU topsites_first_render_ts 2.205s / topsites_first_painted_ts 2.429s
https://perfht.ml/2YYTBLU topsites_first_render_ts 2.158s / topsites_first_painted_ts 2.403s
https://perfht.ml/2ZO8u0O topsites_first_render_ts 2.063s / topsites_first_painted_ts 2.284s
And reverting https://github.com/mozilla/activity-stream/commit/d40f56fd91fbad6ca9d2143a660de72b6527ae2c:
https://perfht.ml/2ZXnolm topsites_first_render_ts 2.145s / topsites_first_painted_ts 2.337s
https://perfht.ml/2Z2tSCE topsites_first_render_ts 2.080s / topsites_first_painted_ts 2.300s
https://perfht.ml/2YRekRP topsites_first_render_ts 2.122s / topsites_first_painted_ts 2.354s
At least the median number for topsites_first_painted_ts shows a 2.8% regression (this usertiming is what the talos test measures). topsites_first_render_ts median also shows a 1.7% regression for this small sample.
So quite likely it is indeed the extended triplets causing the regression.
And another sanity check of --setpref trailhead.firstrun.branches=join
to not have triplets:
https://perfht.ml/2YVwUbB topsites_first_render_ts 2.189s / topsites_first_painted_ts 2.413s
https://perfht.ml/2YVwW3d topsites_first_render_ts 2.061s / topsites_first_painted_ts 2.279s
https://perfht.ml/2ZPrvjI topsites_first_render_ts 2.123s / topsites_first_painted_ts 2.343s
And the median number is within 0.5% for both markers. So showing the triplets on about:home (which this talos test uses) instead of only showing triplets on about:welcome is the source of regression.
Potentially we can run the talos test with something like branches=join
to simulate the common case behavior of the profile being old enough to not show the extended triplets.
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•5 years ago
|
||
mconley, this regression is expected, but we would like to have the startup_about_home_paint measure something more accurate by having the startup test run with a different pref value that turns off "extended triplets" which only show for new users on about:home. This would "fix" the regression by having it measure the same thing it was measuring.
We would also like to have a new "triplets" test / subtest that uses the default pref value. At minimum it would also measure topsites_first_painted_ts but ideally we would (also?) measure a triplets_first_painted_ts (doesn't exist yet).
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•5 years ago
•
|
||
Here's a try run setting branch to join for perf:
https://hg.mozilla.org/try/rev/72f351b666684e97d8cfc26f8b43b0ef23756d0e
Comment 5•5 years ago
|
||
I spoke to Mardak and k88hudson about this today. I'm recording my thoughts here:
In summary, it sounds like what's being detected here isn't a regression in the normal sense. The about:home page acts differently now for the first few runs, and that's what the test is detecting. What I suggest is:
- We pref the "extended triplets" feature off for the startup_about_home_paint Talos test
- We introduce a new, separate Talos test that always shows the "extended triplets"
- We introduce another separate Talos test that shows the "about:welcome" welcome page.
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•5 years ago
|
||
Comment 8•5 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Updated•5 years ago
|
Updated•5 years ago
|
Comment 9•5 years ago
|
||
== Change summary for alert #22858 (as of Tue, 27 Aug 2019 01:55:10 GMT) ==
Improvements:
2% startup_about_home_paint linux64-shippable opt e10s stylo 752.21 -> 737.08
For up to date results, see: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/alerts?id=22858
Updated•5 years ago
|
Updated•3 years ago
|
Description
•