FileLink WebExtensions API Enhancements and Bugfixes.
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Add-Ons: Extensions API, enhancement)
Tracking
(thunderbird_esr6870+ fixed, thunderbird71 fixed)
People
(Reporter: diegocr, Assigned: darktrojan)
References
(Regression)
Details
Attachments
(2 files)
|
1.36 KB,
patch
|
darktrojan
:
feedback+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
|
8.18 KB,
patch
|
mkmelin
:
review+
jorgk-bmo
:
approval-comm-esr68+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
I am attaching a patch to address the issues highlighted in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1481052#c64
I.e. it does:
-
Fixes the error handling loading files.
-
Allow FileLink extensions to get a
Fileinstance instead of loading the file's contents for them.
Any mentor who would like to check this out? Not sure if that's the correct way to submit patches here.
| Reporter | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 1•6 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 3•6 years ago
|
||
Sure, feel free to take over. I do assume that's the faster way to get this shipped with the next TB version. Thanks!
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 5•6 years ago
|
||
Pushed by geoff@darktrojan.net:
https://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/b1480206231d
Add option to CloudFile API to get files as File objects instead of ArrayBuffer; r=mkmelin
| Assignee | ||
Comment 7•6 years ago
|
||
Thanks for your patch, Diego!
| Reporter | ||
Comment 8•6 years ago
|
||
You are welcome, i would also like to leave the door open for possible further enhancements :)
Comment 9•6 years ago
|
||
If you find anything you'd like to improve, we're always interested in patches ;)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 10•6 years ago
|
||
Yeah, that's what i meant, it's very possible that i will submit further patches :)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 11•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 12•6 years ago
|
||
I'd like this to be in ESR after some time on beta.
What do I make of that? Shipping TB 71 beta now/tomorrow/the day after (26th Oct 2019?). We'll do 68.2.1 maybe in the week after. Is that too early?
| Assignee | ||
Comment 13•6 years ago
|
||
Assuming there are no problems reported I'm okay with it being in 68.2.1.
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 14•6 years ago
|
||
TB 68.2.1 ESR:
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-esr68/rev/bae5514de050c3168cb4bfe36b9c5ebf6acfeeff
This needed rebasing. I ended up landing it without the ExtensionTestUtils.failOnSchemaWarnings() stuff.
Description
•