1607969 - ubuntu1804 - TEST-UNEXPECTED-PASS | dom/encoding/test/reftest/reftest.list | adjust expectations for linux1804 and fission

Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 1607964

(Core :: Internationalization, defect, P3)

Description

[Treeherder Bug Filer]

Filed by: egao [at] mozilla.com
Parsed log: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?job_id=284086469&repo=try
Full log: https://firefox-ci-tc.services.mozilla.com/api/queue/v1/task/OSVIMW1nQe2mIaxSEZlvkg/runs/0/artifacts/public/logs/live_backing.log
Reftest URL: https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/raw-file/tip/layout/tools/reftest/reftest-analyzer.xhtml#logurl=https://firefox-ci-tc.services.mozilla.com/api/queue/v1/task/OSVIMW1nQe2mIaxSEZlvkg/runs/0/artifacts/public/logs/live_backing.log&only_show_unexpected=1

---

suite: reftest-no-accel
chunk: 4

notes: fission

context:
several tests now pass when run under ubuntu1804 with no-accel. Update expectations as part of landing the migration of reftest-no-accel to ubuntu1804.

Comment 1

[Edwin Takahashi (:egao | infrequent contributor)]

Attachment: Bug 1607969 - adjust test expectations for dom/encoding/test/reftest on reftest-no-accel and fission and ubuntu1804

Comment 2

[Intermittent Failures Robot]

1 failures in 4472 pushes (0.0 failures/push) were associated with this bug in the last 7 days.

Repository breakdown:

• try: 1

Platform breakdown:

• linux64: 1

For more details, see:
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/intermittent-failures.html#/bugdetails?bug=1607969&startday=2020-01-06&endday=2020-01-12&tree=all

Comment 3

[Chris Peterson [:cpeterson]]

Like bug 1607964 and bug 1607966, looks like we need to update our reftest expectations after updating to ubuntu1804.

@ Timothy, can you please update these reftest expectations when you get a chance (or refer me to someone else)? Do we have separate reftest expectations for Fission and non-Fission modes?

Tracking for Fission Nightly (M6). This bug seems like a higher priority than P5.

Comment 4

[Edwin Takahashi (:egao | infrequent contributor)]

:cpeterson - it seems we do not run fission reftest on central - is this a pressing need? I ask because I have a series of patches to update reftest annotations relating to my linux1804 migration, which I am hoping to land that soon and hoping to avoid overlap with these three bugs.

(for context I filed this bug on try during the migration work and realized that fission reftest was not run on central.)

Comment 5

[Edwin Takahashi (:egao | infrequent contributor)]

For reference, the bug I'm working off to tighten reftest annotation is https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1608582.

Comment 6

[BugBot [:suhaib / :marco/ :calixte]]

The priority flag is not set for this bug.
:m_kato, could you have a look please?

For more information, please visit auto_nag documentation.

Comment 7

[Chris Peterson [:cpeterson]]

(In reply to Edwin Takahashi (:egao | PTO from 02/01 - 03/01) from comment #4)

:cpeterson - it seems we do not run fission reftest on central - is this a pressing need? I ask because I have a series of patches to update reftest annotations relating to my linux1804 migration, which I am hoping to land that soon and hoping to avoid overlap with these three bugs.

We will eventually want all tests running with and without Fission, but Fission reftests are not urgent. (Because Fission is not expected to break rendering.) We would like Fission reftests running and passing in Q2.

Bug 1602323 ("R-Fis") is the metabug for Fission reftests.

Comment 8

[Timothy Nikkel (:tnikkel)]

Whoops, I missed this bug. But I fixed it with the patch in bug 1607964.