ThreadSanitizer: data race [@ assign_assuming_AddRef] vs. [@ operator bool] in CacheStorageService
Categories
(Core :: Networking: Cache, defect, P1)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: decoder, Assigned: michal)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
(Whiteboard: [necko-triaged])
Attachments
(3 files)
The attached crash information was detected while running CI tests with ThreadSanitizer on mozilla-central revision 11c9c5ce3955.
This is a race on mPurgeTimer
being checked vs. it being set to nullptr
. The comment at the read location seems to indicate that this might be expected, but it would still cause random behavior.
General information about TSan reports
Why fix races?
Data races are undefined behavior and can cause crashes as well as correctness issues. Compiler optimizations can cause racy code to have unpredictable and hard-to-reproduce behavior.
Rating
If you think this race can cause crashes or correctness issues, it would be great to rate the bug appropriately as P1/P2 and/or indicating this in the bug. This makes it a lot easier for us to assess the actual impact that these reports make and if they are helpful to you.
False Positives / Benign Races
Typically, races reported by TSan are not false positives [1], but it is possible that the race is benign. Even in this case it would be nice to come up with a fix if it is easily doable and does not regress performance. Every race that we cannot fix will have to remain on the suppression list and slows down the overall TSan performance. Also note that seemingly benign races can possibly be harmful (also depending on the compiler, optimizations and the architecture) [2][3].
[1] One major exception is the involvement of uninstrumented code from third-party libraries.
[2] http://software.intel.com/en-us/blogs/2013/01/06/benign-data-races-what-could-possibly-go-wrong
[3] How to miscompile programs with "benign" data races: https://www.usenix.org/legacy/events/hotpar11/tech/final_files/Boehm.pdf
Suppressing unfixable races
If the bug cannot be fixed, then a runtime suppression needs to be added in mozglue/build/TsanOptions.cpp
. The suppressions match on the full stack, so it should be picked such that it is unique to this particular race. The bug number of this bug should also be included so we have some documentation on why this suppression was added.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•5 years ago
|
||
![]() |
||
Comment 2•5 years ago
|
||
Purpose of the if (mPurgeTimer) return;
is only an optimization to not schedule the event below.
The most proper fix is to lock access over mPurgeTimer in OnMemoryConsumotionChange as well.
Updated•5 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•5 years ago
|
||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Comment 5•5 years ago
|
||
Backed out changeset 4758bb49e763 for causing multiple failures.
Backout link: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/c078d08afa05139cdd28659604214a3bf79adde9
Failure logs:
- https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#/jobs?job_id=288535841&repo=autoland&lineNumber=21865
- https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#/jobs?job_id=288535986&repo=autoland&lineNumber=25229
- https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#/jobs?job_id=288535920&repo=autoland&lineNumber=7751
- https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#/jobs?job_id=288535924&repo=autoland&lineNumber=2208
- https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#/jobs?job_id=288537786&repo=autoland&lineNumber=1992
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•5 years ago
|
||
The problem is that normal order of locking is CacheStorageService::mLock -> CacheEntry::mLock -> CacheFile::mLock. The patch introduces a different order and deadlock may happen:
CacheStorageService::OnMemoryConsumptionChange() << grabs CacheStorageService::mLock
CacheFileMetadata::EnsureBuffer()
CacheFileMetadata::SetElement()
CacheFile::SetElement() << holds CacheFile::mLock
Updated•5 years ago
|
![]() |
||
Comment 7•5 years ago
|
||
Ah... yes... then we probably need a relaxed/bool atomic flag for this... (Honza not happy)
Christian, can this be easily excluded?
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•5 years ago
|
||
Adding a runtime suppression is not recommend because we can only do that based on stacks (and that could cause other bugs to be hidden).
If you don't want to make this an atomic in general, you could make an #ifdef MOZ_TSAN
change that only affects our TSan builds. In this case, I think that would be preferred over using a runtime suppression.
![]() |
||
Comment 9•5 years ago
|
||
Thanks, makes perfect sense!
Comment 10•5 years ago
|
||
Comment 11•5 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Reporter | ||
Comment 12•5 years ago
|
||
Can you also remove the related suppression found in mozglue/build/TsanOptions.cpp
(you can search for the bug number)? You can flag me for review. Thanks!
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•5 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Comment 14•5 years ago
|
||
Comment 15•5 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Updated•5 years ago
|
Description
•