Further improvements to CardDAV
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Address Book, task)
Tracking
(thunderbird_esr78 fixed)
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| thunderbird_esr78 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: darktrojan, Assigned: darktrojan)
References
Details
Attachments
(3 files)
|
5.21 KB,
patch
|
mkmelin
:
review+
wsmwk
:
approval-comm-esr78+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
|
18.04 KB,
patch
|
mkmelin
:
review+
wsmwk
:
approval-comm-esr78+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
|
8.60 KB,
patch
|
mkmelin
:
review+
wsmwk
:
approval-comm-esr78+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
There is more work to do on CardDAV. I think it's worth closing bug 546932 and starting this new one, not least to uplifting patches less confusing.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•5 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•5 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•5 years ago
|
||
This is almost entirely cut-and-paste, not as much real change as it looks.
Using some tricks I've found in other places, I moved the callback functions out into an object, which can be QI'ed to the right interface (satisfying nsIInterfaceRequestor).
I also changed how password failures are handled, see the start of promptAuth. This achieves the same result without storing an extra value.
Comment 4•5 years ago
|
||
Comment 5•5 years ago
|
||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Pushed by geoff@darktrojan.net:
https://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/47b40ea44701
Use JS class inheritance to simplify CardDAV card modification. r=mkmelin
https://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/63669b838a3f
Detect and resolve conflicts in CardDAV cards. r=mkmelin
https://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/21a41a633ee9
Simplify channel callbacks in CardDAVDirectory. r=mkmelin
| Assignee | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Comment 7•5 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9161536 [details] [diff] [review]
1650733-carddav-sync-super-1.diff
One request for all patches. This is all preffed off stuff.
Comment 8•5 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9161536 [details] [diff] [review]
1650733-carddav-sync-super-1.diff
[Triage Comment]
Approved for esr78
Comment 9•5 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9161538 [details] [diff] [review]
1650733-carddav-conflict-1.diff
[Triage Comment]
Approved for esr78
Comment 10•5 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9161541 [details] [diff] [review]
1650733-carddav-callbacks-1.diff
[Triage Comment]
Approved for esr78
| Assignee | ||
Comment 11•5 years ago
|
||
| bugherder uplift | ||
Comment 12•5 years ago
|
||
Maybe you could consider reopening this Bug? There are other Improvements to the CardDav feature that you may want to look into - ege.:
-
'Global' Readonly adressbooks: Some adressbooks in groupware solutions are made readonly, often used as a kind of global adressbook. At the moment they would get synced but with a Adressbook with tenthousands of adresses - this may not be ideal... -> Cardbook and SOGo (not sure about TBSync) did allow for a searchable but not syncable adressbook. LDAP is not suitable as areplacement - as for one thing TB crashes / hangs when the server is not reachable but the computer is not offline at the same time - and the ldap port is very offten blocked in public networks.
-
Syncronisation of Lists: At the moment the list feature is not available to carddav adressbooks (but the button is shown ;-) ). I am not sure if the VLIST-Format is SOGo specific or if it is a offial draft but you could at least allow the creation of those and let a plugin handle the synchronisation?
The SOGo/inverse team is giving up its own carddav provider (or at least they tend to as the beta is build this way) in their plugin in favour of your implementation but in doing so the loose both of this features that are very important to us. If they are missing people have more valid points in favour of outlook/exchange
Just putting it in here so that you at least know about it, if you say its to SOGo specific or whatever just delete this comment
Comment 13•5 years ago
|
||
I would like to second (+1) the request from @Lukas.Wringer
Comment 14•5 years ago
|
||
We usually fix only one thing in a bug. I think you should open a new bug for (each) of those.
Comment 15•5 years ago
|
||
Done: #1668788 and #1668791
Description
•