Could not find artifacts for a toolchain build named `linux64-node`
Categories
(Firefox Build System :: Bootstrap Configuration, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
People
(Reporter: jkratzer, Assigned: mhentges)
References
(Blocks 2 open bugs)
Details
Attachments
(4 files)
11.00 KB,
text/plain
|
Details | |
1.58 MB,
application/zip
|
Details | |
4.22 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
5.62 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Running ./mach bootstrap
on mozilla-central rev e375b85cfba3 fails with the following error message:
0:05.67 Could not find artifacts for a toolchain build named `linux64-node`. Local commits, dirty/stale files, and other changes in your checkout may cause this error. Make sure you are on a fresh, current checkout of mozilla-central. If you are already, you may be able to avoid this error by running `mach clobber python`. Beware that commands like `mach bootstrap` and `mach artifact` are unlikely to work on any versions of the code besides recent revisions of mozilla-central.
Error running mach:
['bootstrap']
The error occurred in code that was called by the mach command. This is either
a bug in the called code itself or in the way that mach is calling it.
You can invoke |./mach busted| to check if this issue is already on file. If it
isn't, please use |./mach busted file bootstrap| to report it. If |./mach busted| is
misbehaving, you can also inspect the dependencies of bug 1543241.
If filing a bug, please include the full output of mach, including this error
message.
The details of the failure are as follows:
subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['/usr/bin/python3', '/home/user/source/mozilla-central/mach', 'artifact', 'toolchain', '--bootstrap', '--from-build', 'linux64-node']' returned non-zero exit status 1.
File "/home/user/source/mozilla-central/python/mozboot/mozboot/mach_commands.py", line 45, in bootstrap
bootstrapper.bootstrap()
File "/home/user/source/mozilla-central/python/mozboot/mozboot/bootstrap.py", line 578, in bootstrap
checkout_root)
File "/home/user/source/mozilla-central/python/mozboot/mozboot/bootstrap.py", line 421, in maybe_install_private_packages_or_exit
self.instance.ensure_node_packages(state_dir, checkout_root)
File "/home/user/source/mozilla-central/python/mozboot/mozboot/linux_common.py", line 102, in ensure_node_packages
self.install_toolchain_artifact(state_dir, checkout_root, node.LINUX)
File "/home/user/source/mozilla-central/python/mozboot/mozboot/base.py", line 356, in install_toolchain_artifact
subprocess.check_call(cmd, cwd=state_dir)
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/subprocess.py", line 311, in check_call
raise CalledProcessError(retcode, cmd)
Comment 1•4 years ago
|
||
Do you have modifications to taskcluster/scripts/misc/repack-node.sh or taskcluster/ci/toolchain/node.yml in your tree? That's about the only way this could happen.
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•4 years ago
|
||
I do not. This is on a brand new clone of mozilla-central.
Comment 3•4 years ago
|
||
Can you still reproduce the issue today?
If so, to be clear, hg parent
shows that you're updated to the latest central
, and hg status
(and hg status -i
) are clean?
If so, does mach clobber python
fix it, or no? What about an hg purge --all
(you can exclude your mozconfig
and objdir
to avoid losing a bunch of state if you need to)?
(Sorry for all the questions, I'm trying to isolate the source of the problem.)
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•4 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•4 years ago
•
|
||
Yes, I can still reproduce it today as of m-c 98f04ffcd64a. I've attached the full ./mach bootstrap
log including the commands you suggested.
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•4 years ago
•
|
||
Hey, can you paste the results of hg files -0
? I wonder if unexpected files are being picked up 🤔
I've just done a fresh clone of mozilla-central
, checked out 98f04ffcd64a
, performed a ./mach clobber python
and hg purge --all
, and yet my bootstrap isn't reproducing the issue, which is a bit of a bummer.
Comment 7•4 years ago
|
||
In the case of node, there is no wildcard involved. The only file that is being hashed for it is taskcluster/scripts/misc/repack-node.sh
. What is the sha256sum of that file in your tree?
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•4 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•4 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mitchell Hentges [:mhentges] 🦀 from comment #6)
Hey, can you paste the results of
hg files -0
? I wonder if unexpected files are being picked up 🤔
I've just done a fresh clone ofmozilla-central
, checked out98f04ffcd64a
, performed a./mach clobber python
andhg purge --all
, and yet my bootstrap isn't reproducing the issue, which is a bit of a bummer.
Mitchell, I've attached the output of hg files
.
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•4 years ago
•
|
||
Thanks! It looks like there's exactly one repack-node.sh
detected by hg
, so that's good!
Two other questions to help with investigation:
- Can you run
sha256sum taskcluster/scripts/misc/repack-node.sh
and paste the result? - Which hg revision are you on (
hd id
)? I'm guessing2944e59
?
EDIT: My local hg files -0
result is identical to yours, which is a good sign :)
I'm very interested in your repack-node.sh
hash. FWIW, mine is 68405772781a5f18a65ad1841053884ed23b9fd63313e1b3628bc4689798b298
.
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•4 years ago
|
||
Also, if you don't mind, try applying this patch (hg import --no-commit ~/debug-artifact.patch
) and paste the output.
Reporter | ||
Comment 12•4 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mitchell Hentges [:mhentges] 🦀 from comment #10)
Thanks! It looks like there's exactly one
repack-node.sh
detected byhg
, so that's good!
Two other questions to help with investigation:
- Can you run
sha256sum taskcluster/scripts/misc/repack-node.sh
and paste the result?
$ sha256sum taskcluster/scripts/misc/repack-node.sh
68405772781a5f18a65ad1841053884ed23b9fd63313e1b3628bc4689798b298 taskcluster/scripts/misc/repack-node.sh
- Which hg revision are you on (
hd id
)? I'm guessing2944e59
?
$ hg id
63d860f118da tip
Reporter | ||
Comment 13•4 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mitchell Hentges [:mhentges] 🦀 from comment #11)
Created attachment 9171746 [details] [diff] [review]
debug-artifact.patchAlso, if you don't mind, try applying this patch (
hg import --no-commit ~/debug-artifact.patch
) and paste the output.
head_ref: 63d860f118da09320ed65431129775b4e3631ff3
repack-node.sh hash: 68405772781a5f18a65ad1841053884ed23b9fd63313e1b3628bc4689798b298
hash_paths(...): ['803f598fc69d38059626f273a4955b9f8d11b995946a2018c2a144e4fd578f92']
taskdesc["cache"]["digest-data"]: ['803f598fc69d38059626f273a4955b9f8d11b995946a2018c2a144e4fd578f92', 'public/build/node.tar.xz', 'deb8-toolchain-build', 'linux64', '10']
repack-node.sh hash: 68405772781a5f18a65ad1841053884ed23b9fd63313e1b3628bc4689798b298
repack-node.sh hash: 68405772781a5f18a65ad1841053884ed23b9fd63313e1b3628bc4689798b298
repack-node.sh hash: 68405772781a5f18a65ad1841053884ed23b9fd63313e1b3628bc4689798b298
task["dependencies"]: {}
linux64-node-10 digest: 644e95189325a06123aee8cbd0daef7a223350db9d81cf563b91e0bec30f9805
task.optimization["index-search"]: ['gecko.cache.level-3.toolchains.v3.linux64-node-10.hash.644e95189325a06123aee8cbd0daef7a223350db9d81cf563b91e0bec30f9805']
0:05.39 Could not find artifacts for a toolchain build named `linux64-node`. Local commits, dirty/stale files, and other changes in your checkout may cause this error. Make sure you are on a fresh, current checkout of mozilla-central. If you are already, you may be able to avoid this error by running `mach clobber python`. Beware that commands like `mach bootstrap` and `mach artifact` are unlikely to work on any versions of the code besides recent revisions of mozilla-central.
Error running mach:
['bootstrap']
The error occurred in code that was called by the mach command. This is either
a bug in the called code itself or in the way that mach is calling it.
You can invoke |./mach busted| to check if this issue is already on file. If it
isn't, please use |./mach busted file bootstrap| to report it. If |./mach busted| is
misbehaving, you can also inspect the dependencies of bug 1543241.
If filing a bug, please include the full output of mach, including this error
message.
The details of the failure are as follows:
subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['/usr/bin/python3', '/home/user/source/mozilla-central/mach', 'artifact', 'toolchain', '--bootstrap', '--from-build', 'linux64-node']' returned non-zero exit status 1.
File "/home/user/source/mozilla-central/python/mozboot/mozboot/mach_commands.py", line 45, in bootstrap
bootstrapper.bootstrap()
File "/home/user/source/mozilla-central/python/mozboot/mozboot/bootstrap.py", line 578, in bootstrap
checkout_root)
File "/home/user/source/mozilla-central/python/mozboot/mozboot/bootstrap.py", line 421, in maybe_install_private_packages_or_exit
self.instance.ensure_node_packages(state_dir, checkout_root)
File "/home/user/source/mozilla-central/python/mozboot/mozboot/linux_common.py", line 102, in ensure_node_packages
self.install_toolchain_artifact(state_dir, checkout_root, node.LINUX)
File "/home/user/source/mozilla-central/python/mozboot/mozboot/base.py", line 356, in install_toolchain_artifact
subprocess.check_call(cmd, cwd=state_dir)
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/subprocess.py", line 311, in check_call
raise CalledProcessError(retcode, cmd)
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•4 years ago
|
||
That's really helpful, thanks!
Looks like the task IDs are being generated correctly - can you load this link in your browser? I wonder if mach
is failing to communicate with Taskcluster 🤔
I've added a new patch to test that^ theory. Can you apply it and paste your logs again?
Reporter | ||
Comment 15•4 years ago
|
||
Welp, looks like I've found the issue. I had TASKCLUSTER_ROOT_URL=https://community-tc.services.mozilla.com
set system wide which was causing the artifact URL to resolve to https://community-tc.services.mozilla.com/api/index/v1/task/gecko.cache.level-3.toolchains.v3.linux64-node-10.hash.644e95189325a06123aee8cbd0daef7a223350db9d81cf563b91e0bec30f9805
.
Thanks so much for helping me debug this. I'll go ahead and close it as WFM.
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•4 years ago
|
||
No worries, glad we got to the bottom of it. I'll submit a patch to improve the error message when artifacts can't be found 😁
Description
•