bubbling & capturing event are in wrong order
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Events, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox116 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: frederic.linot, Assigned: vhilla)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug, )
Details
(Keywords: perf-alert)
Attachments
(2 files, 1 obsolete file)
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:92.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/92.0
Steps to reproduce:
<html>
<head><title>Titre de la page</title></head>
<body>
<div id="monDiv">
<a href='#' id="monLien">Ordre des phases de capture & bouillonnement.</a>
<p>Un paragraphe</p>
</div>
<script>
monDiv.addEventListener('click', function(e) {
console.log(e.currentTarget) ;
alert("DIV (bubbling).");
}, false);
monLien.addEventListener('click', function(e) {
console.log(e.currentTarget) ;
alert("Link (bubbling).");
}, false);
monDiv.addEventListener('click', function(e) {
console.log(e.currentTarget) ;
alert("DIV (capturing).");
}, true);
monLien.addEventListener('click', function(e) {
console.log(e.currentTarget) ;
alert("Link (capturing).");
}, true);
</script>
</body>
</html>
Actual results:
DIV (capturing).
Link (bubbling)
Link (capturing).
DIV (bubbling)
Expected results:
DIV (capturing)
Link (capturing)
Link (bubbling)
DIV (bubbling)
Comment 1•3 years ago
|
||
The Bugbug bot thinks this bug should belong to the 'Core::DOM: Core & HTML' component, and is moving the bug to that component. Please revert this change in case you think the bot is wrong.
Updated•3 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•3 years ago
|
||
Changing severity to S1 because impact more than 25% users.
Comment 3•3 years ago
|
||
Please don't change tracking and severity/priority flags, this will be set by the triaging team, thanks.
Comment 4•3 years ago
|
||
smaug, should this be more severe?
Confirmed: https://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/saved/9651
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•3 years ago
|
||
I think this should be more severe because all codes with for example stopPropagation in capturing phase whill not work anymore...
Comment 6•3 years ago
|
||
The specs on this have changed couple of times, so what Gecko has is some variant of some older version of a spec.
(at some point capturing listeners weren't supposed to fire at all at target phase)
A patch coming, let's see how many tests will be broken.
Comment 7•3 years ago
|
||
Comment 9•3 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Comment 11•3 years ago
|
||
== Change summary for alert #32168 (as of Thu, 28 Oct 2021 19:56:23 GMT) ==
Improvements:
Ratio | Test | Platform | Options | Absolute values (old vs new) |
---|---|---|---|---|
92% | ebay LastVisualChange | windows10-64-shippable-qr | warm webrender | 4,376.17 -> 342.75 |
92% | ebay LastVisualChange | linux1804-64-shippable-qr | warm webrender | 4,436.67 -> 360.00 |
91% | ebay LastVisualChange | macosx1015-64-shippable-qr | warm webrender | 4,483.33 -> 423.33 |
89% | ebay SpeedIndex | windows10-64-shippable-qr | warm webrender | 2,171.17 -> 248.08 |
88% | ebay LastVisualChange | macosx1014-64-shippable-qr | warm webrender | 4,613.33 -> 540.00 |
... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
34% | ebay ContentfulSpeedIndex | macosx1014-64-shippable-qr | cold webrender | 1,545.67 -> 1,023.75 |
For up to date results, see: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perfherder/alerts?id=32168
Updated•3 years ago
|
Comment 12•3 years ago
|
||
Backed out for causing Bug 1739045
Comment 13•3 years ago
|
||
Updated•3 years ago
|
Comment 14•3 years ago
|
||
Backout merged to central: https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/90b27f1a54ee5103617abac2abcdc5353fc65b8e
Reporter | ||
Comment 15•3 years ago
|
||
So ebay is more important than standards for Firefox...
Are you shure #1739045 is realy a bug ? Have you checked that eBay had not created a specific rule for Firefox in order to work around your bug which has existed for so long ?
Comment 16•3 years ago
|
||
Backing out a patch doesn't mean the change will never happen. If a change causes major issues, it should be backed out asap and debugging the issue can happen then using local builds.
Comment 17•3 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Cristian Tuns from comment #12)
Backed out for causing Bug 1739045
== Change summary for alert #32307 (as of Mon, 08 Nov 2021 12:15:55 GMT) ==
Regressions:
Ratio | Test | Platform | Options | Absolute values (old vs new) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1195% | ebay LastVisualChange | windows10-64-shippable-qr | warm webrender | 337.75 -> 4,372.33 |
1132% | ebay LastVisualChange | linux1804-64-shippable-qr | warm webrender | 360.00 -> 4,436.67 |
1132% | ebay LastVisualChange | linux1804-64-shippable-qr | warm webrender | 360.00 -> 4,436.67 |
1132% | ebay LastVisualChange | linux1804-64-shippable-qr | warm webrender | 360.00 -> 4,436.67 |
942% | ebay LastVisualChange | macosx1015-64-shippable-qr | warm webrender | 430.00 -> 4,480.00 |
781% | ebay SpeedIndex | windows10-64-shippable-qr | warm webrender | 245.92 -> 2,167.67 |
756% | ebay LastVisualChange | macosx1014-64-shippable-qr | warm webrender | 540.00 -> 4,620.00 |
734% | ebay SpeedIndex | linux1804-64-shippable-qr | warm webrender | 258.33 -> 2,154.58 |
656% | ebay PerceptualSpeedIndex | windows10-64-shippable-qr | warm webrender | 240.17 -> 1,815.25 |
619% | ebay PerceptualSpeedIndex | linux1804-64-shippable-qr | warm webrender | 253.00 -> 1,818.08 |
... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
139% | ebay ContentfulSpeedIndex | macosx1014-64-shippable-qr | warm webrender | 393.25 -> 939.67 |
88% | ebay ContentfulSpeedIndex | windows10-64-shippable-qr | cold webrender | 599.50 -> 1,125.75 |
73% | ebay ContentfulSpeedIndex | linux1804-64-shippable-qr | cold webrender | 681.17 -> 1,178.75 |
60% | ebay ContentfulSpeedIndex | macosx1015-64-shippable-qr | cold webrender | 778.75 -> 1,244.08 |
50% | ebay ContentfulSpeedIndex | macosx1014-64-shippable-qr | cold webrender | 1,043.00 -> 1,563.92 |
For up to date results, see: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perfherder/alerts?id=32307
Comment 18•3 years ago
|
||
There's a r+ patch which didn't land and no activity in this bug for 2 weeks.
:smaug, could you have a look please?
For more information, please visit auto_nag documentation.
Updated•3 years ago
|
Updated•2 years ago
|
Updated•2 years ago
|
Comment 20•2 years ago
|
||
FWIW, I just tried out an old build with the patches here. It's working well on ebay. Something may have been fixed on ebay? Anyway, I think it's worth we try to re-land the patche to improve this interoperability issue.
Comment 21•2 years ago
|
||
Talked with Olli, we appreciate Vincent's help here :)
Assignee | ||
Comment 22•2 years ago
|
||
Comment hidden (advocacy) |
Comment hidden (advocacy) |
Comment 25•1 years ago
|
||
There is work ongoing on getting this fixed, see the phab revision.
Comment 26•1 years ago
|
||
Comment 27•1 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Assignee | ||
Updated•1 year ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 28•1 year ago
|
||
The perf regression persists also with the updated eBay version: comparison
Assignee | ||
Comment 29•1 year ago
|
||
Comment 30•1 year ago
|
||
Comment 31•1 year ago
|
||
bugherder |
Comment 32•1 year ago
|
||
The flag is only enabled on Nightly, why close the issue then? As it stands, there’s no guarantee it will land in 116 stable.
Assignee | ||
Comment 33•1 year ago
|
||
Right, we want to get some testing in Nightly before fully activating the pref. Also, wpt metadata of this kind should be removed.
Updated•1 year ago
|
Comment 34•1 year ago
|
||
Usually we'd close the bug when the code has landed and then open a new bug to enable it everywhere.
Assignee | ||
Updated•1 year ago
|
Updated•1 year ago
|
Updated•1 year ago
|
Description
•