Closed
Bug 173724
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
money.cnn.com - extremely bad performance
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect)
Core
Layout
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: 3.14, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: perf)
Attachments
(3 files)
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021002
When going to $URL, say from http://piology.org/YASEP.html, it makes Mozilla
unresponsive for some seconds. Going back has the same effect. I have no clue
what the reason is (so this component, sorry). It is perfectly reproducible and
has been happening for a very long time, I just never reported it. I cannot find
a dupe.
pi
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
it is unresponsive before/during/after it loads?
I got about 1/2 second pause after it had loaded, linux trunk build 20021009
450 MHz P-II
Comment 2•22 years ago
|
||
related: bug 167757 ?
seems to wfm anyway using Phoenix 20021007 on Win2k, could it be due to the
DHTML menu generation ?
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•22 years ago
|
||
Andrew, I click the link, the page builds and looks finished (the progress bar
is not, though). Then for about three seconds (some pentium II style, I don't
know exactly) it does not do anything. Going back sometimes has the delay, but
shorter.
Olivier, I don't encounter the problem from bug 167757, don't know if related.
pi
Comment 4•22 years ago
|
||
ok, the fact that it happens (for you and me) after the page loads, I would
suspect that it's doing some javascript setup for menus or something.
You might try using Venkman to profile the page during load.
Comment 5•22 years ago
|
||
it says HM_f_StartIt used 3+ seconds, although my system certainly wasn't
unresponsive for that long. Nothing really stands out as taking too much time.
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•22 years ago
|
||
OK, I don't understand what that means, but here is my data.
pi
Comment 7•22 years ago
|
||
the profile you got looks pretty similar to mine. Basically, there doesn't
apear to be a big culprit that's doing something evil. It appears to just be
intensive menu initialization.
Does the page load more quickly in other browsers (Opera/IE/Konq..)? Did it
used to load more quickly in Mozilla?
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•22 years ago
|
||
Problem also happens with Windows.
pi
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•22 years ago
|
||
OK, I tested on my Win98SE playstation;-)
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/2002101108 -> attached
Mozilla/4.79 [en] (Win98; U) much faster
Opera 6 much faster, but menus don't work
IE 6 first works, than for a shorter time than Mozilla not
So Mozilla is performing worst.
pi
OS: Linux → All
Hardware: PC → All
Comment 10•22 years ago
|
||
using trunk build 2003041508 on winxp things are fine.
marking wfm?
Comment 11•22 years ago
|
||
I still see this with linux trunk 20030419. Markus: I bet your computer is fast
enough to do the DHTML more quickly.
Boris: how fast is your computer? (see comment 1)
Comment 13•22 years ago
|
||
Cannot confirm this. Meaby because i have Athlon 18Ghz, but i dont see anything
special when moving between those two pages. Meaby it's related to Win98
architecture only?
Reporter | ||
Comment 14•22 years ago
|
||
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030331
I still see this. AMD Athlon 800.
pi
Comment 16•21 years ago
|
||
WFM Gecko/20030917 Firebird/0.6.1+, Windows XP.
Comment 17•20 years ago
|
||
I can confirm this bug with Mozilla 1.7.5 on Windows XP on a 3GHz Pentium.
The work-around I use is to put the click in the URL and press Enter. I need to
do this about 3-4 times, at which point the full page loads quickly.
Comment 18•20 years ago
|
||
I can confirm this bug with Mozilla 1.7.5 on Windows XP on a 3GHz Pentium.
The work-around I use is to click in the URL bar and press Enter. I need to do
this about 3-4 times, at which point the full page loads quickly.
Comment 19•18 years ago
|
||
I think this bug has been fixed in Seamonkey 1.1.1.
Comment 20•17 years ago
|
||
Anyone still confirming this bug?
Updated•17 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•