regenerate webrtc json/moz.build files for openbsd support after bug #1744644
Categories
(Core :: WebRTC, defect, P2)
Tracking
()
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox-esr91 | --- | unaffected |
firefox95 | --- | unaffected |
firefox96 | --- | unaffected |
firefox97 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: gaston, Assigned: gaston)
References
(Regression)
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Attachments
(2 files)
19.04 KB,
patch
|
mjf
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
10.00 KB,
patch
|
mjf
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
cf https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1747196#c14 , openbsd support was readded in bug #1654448 but bug #1744644 broke it.
working on it, hoping to get something commited for 97.
Updated•3 years ago
|
Updated•3 years ago
|
Comment 1•3 years ago
|
||
Set release status flags based on info from the regressing bug 1744644
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•3 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•3 years ago
|
||
i've been able to link libxu l (from a previously failing objdir) with those and https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/432387e4879b, redoing a clobber build overnight to confirm but those changes are mechanical.
Updated•3 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•3 years ago
|
||
m-c building from a clean objdir with those patches, horray :)
Comment 5•3 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9257049 [details] [diff] [review]
regen openbsd json files
This looks good - basically when Bug 1654448 landed, those patches should have been rebased onto tip (and regen'd) before landing. This is what would have happened if the rebase/regen had been done.
Comment 6•3 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9257050 [details] [diff] [review]
regen moz.build files
This looks good - basically when Bug 1654448 landed, those patches should have been rebased onto tip (and regen'd) before landing. This is what would have happened if the rebase/regen had been done.
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•3 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Michael Froman [:mjf] from comment #5)
Comment on attachment 9257049 [details] [diff] [review]
regen openbsd json filesThis looks good - basically when Bug 1654448 landed, those patches should have been rebased onto tip (and regen'd) before landing. This is what would have happened if the rebase/regen had been done.
well, you cant really expect everyone/external contributors not working daily on mozilla-central to keep up with what happens in it :)
thanks for the landing ! once it merged to m-c i'll make sure that the tree builds for us :)
Comment 9•3 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/436f3c0ae63b
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/3607c4937e84
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•3 years ago
|
||
m-c from https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/e633666f5eb7 built fine on openbsd, thanks !
Updated•3 years ago
|
Description
•