Closed Bug 1774696 Opened 2 years ago Closed 2 years ago

Fix layout of the special date field

Categories

(Thunderbird :: Address Book, defect)

defect

Tracking

(thunderbird_esr102? fixed, thunderbird103? wontfix)

RESOLVED FIXED
104 Branch
Tracking Status
thunderbird_esr102 ? fixed
thunderbird103 ? wontfix

People

(Reporter: aleca, Assigned: aleca)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

The "Special Dates" field in the new Address Book edit view is not properly aligned, with the most noticeable issue being the year number input on a second line.

Another issues is the fact that the "month" and "day" labels are selectable in the dropdown, which is just a mistake.

Another issue are wrong values, examples:

Year  Month  Day    Result
2000  n/a    1   -> 2000----01
3     2      1   -> 03-0-2--01
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Depends on: 1773031
Attachment #9281734 - Attachment description: Bug 1774696 - Fix layout of the special date field. r=darktrojan → WIP: Bug 1774696 - Fix layout of the special date field.
Attachment #9281734 - Attachment description: WIP: Bug 1774696 - Fix layout of the special date field. → Bug 1774696 - Fix layout of the special date field. r=darktrojan,Paenglab
Target Milestone: --- → 104 Branch

Pushed by alessandro@thunderbird.net:
https://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/88da731814c9
Fix layout of the special date field. r=darktrojan,Paenglab

Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 2 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED

Comment on attachment 9281734 [details]
Bug 1774696 - Fix layout of the special date field. r=darktrojan,Paenglab

[Approval Request Comment]
Regression caused by (bug #): -
User impact if declined: The horizontal and vertical views of the contacts list don't respect the density changes, and the horizontal layout doesn't look very polished
Testing completed (on c-c, etc.): on c-c
Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): it should be low as the changes applied are purely visual

Attachment #9281734 - Flags: approval-comm-esr102?
Attachment #9281734 - Flags: approval-comm-beta?
Regressions: 1779100

deferring beta uplift, to include bug 1779100

See Also: → 1743842
Regressions: 1779789

(In reply to Wayne Mery (:wsmwk) from comment #5)

deferring beta uplift, to include bug 1779100

Still deferring

This missed beta uplift, so it will appear in beta 104 with the next esr opportunity being 102.1.1

Whiteboard: [TM:102.1.1]
Attachment #9281734 - Flags: approval-comm-beta? → approval-comm-beta-

Comment on attachment 9281734 [details]
Bug 1774696 - Fix layout of the special date field. r=darktrojan,Paenglab

[Triage Comment]
Approved for esr102

Attachment #9281734 - Flags: approval-comm-esr102? → approval-comm-esr102+
Whiteboard: [TM:102.1.1]

looks like this depends on changes from bug 1776372 - is that okay to uplift?

Flags: needinfo?(alessandro)

Yes, it should be good

Flags: needinfo?(alessandro)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: