WebP image on istockphoto is not displayed
Categories
(Core :: Graphics: ImageLib, defect)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: Nomis101, Assigned: tnikkel)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
48 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
diannaS
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
diannaS
:
approval-mozilla-esr102+
|
Details | Review |
The image on this page is displayed in Safari and Google Chrome on Mac, but not in Firefox.
https://www.istockphoto.com/de/foto/cocktail-am-pool-genie%C3%9Fen-gm950688808-259497731
The Image is in webp format. image.webp.enabled is set to true. Firefox gives an error in the console "Image corrupt or truncated." After investigating the picture it seems the image contains XML metadata.
Tested with Firefox 102 and 104.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•2 years ago
|
||
Updated•2 years ago
|
Comment 3•2 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Thanks for the fix. I can verify that this is fixed now. I was wondering if it would be possible to have this fixed in 102ESR as well? Or is there something against it?
Comment 6•2 years ago
|
||
Seems reasonable. Go ahead and nominate for Beta and ESR102.
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•2 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9286754 [details]
Bug 1780834. If a webp file header specifies ICCP but no ICCP chunk is found just ignore it and continue. r?aosmond
ESR Uplift Approval Request
- If this is not a sec:{high,crit} bug, please state case for ESR consideration: some webp images not displayed
- User impact if declined: some webp images not displayed
- Fix Landed on Version: 105
- Risk to taking this patch: Low
- Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky): we process the webp file the same as every other webp that doesn't have a single bit set in the header
Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request
- User impact if declined: some webp images not displayed
- Is this code covered by automated tests?: Yes
- Has the fix been verified in Nightly?: No
- Needs manual test from QE?: No
- If yes, steps to reproduce:
- List of other uplifts needed: None
- Risk to taking this patch: Low
- Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky): we process the webp file the same as every other webp that doesn't have a single bit set in the header
- String changes made/needed:
- Is Android affected?: Yes
Comment 8•2 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9286754 [details]
Bug 1780834. If a webp file header specifies ICCP but no ICCP chunk is found just ignore it and continue. r?aosmond
Approved for 104.b3
Comment 9•2 years ago
|
||
bugherder uplift |
Comment 10•2 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9286754 [details]
Bug 1780834. If a webp file header specifies ICCP but no ICCP chunk is found just ignore it and continue. r?aosmond
Approved for 102.2esr
Comment 11•2 years ago
|
||
bugherder uplift |
Description
•