The necko consumers should use the HTTP/3 priority's incremental flag
Categories
(Core :: Networking: HTTP, task, P3)
Tracking
()
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox128 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: dragana, Assigned: valentin)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
(Whiteboard: [necko-triaged])
Attachments
(1 file)
We have the implementation of the incremental flag from rfc9218, but the necko consumers do not use it at the moment.
We will determine which consumers should set the flag and implement the changes.
Assignee | ||
Updated•2 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•2 years ago
|
||
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9218#name-incremental
If a client makes concurrent requests with the incremental parameter set to true, serving requests with the same urgency concurrently might be beneficial. Doing this distributes the connection bandwidth, meaning that responses take longer to complete. Incremental delivery is most useful where multiple partial responses might provide some value to clients ahead of a complete response being available.
Comment 3•10 months ago
|
||
Images with progressive rendering should be a good candidate for enabling this flag.
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•5 months ago
|
||
This patch sets the incremental flag on document and image channels
Updated•5 months ago
|
Comment 6•5 months ago
|
||
bugherder |
Description
•