Closed
Bug 1788621
Opened 3 years ago
Closed 3 years ago
Add more rules to determine whether a form with only a cc-number field is a valid cc section
Categories
(Toolkit :: Form Autofill, task, P1)
Toolkit
Form Autofill
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
106 Branch
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox106 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: dimi, Assigned: dimi)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [fxcm-fathom-cc-p2])
Attachments
(1 file)
|
48 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
Details |
There are cases where sites use a separate form/iframe for a cc-number field (either cc-number in one form, other cc-* in another form, OR each cc-* is in its own form). For thoses, we don't have cc-name or cc-exp to help us determine whether this is a cc form. To support those use cases, we can add two extra rules to identify a valid credit card section:
- Use a higher confidence threshold.
- Check whether the <input> is the only non-hidden input field of its form
For rule1, it is implemented in Bug 1783129 , this bug will focus on rule2
Updated•3 years ago
|
See Also: → https://mozilla-hub.atlassian.net/browse/FXCM-81
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•3 years ago
|
||
Pushed by dlee@mozilla.com:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/f3e5a79c5252
Add an extra rule to determine whether a form with only a cc-number field is a valid cc form r=sgalich
Comment 3•3 years ago
|
||
Backed out changeset f3e5a79c5252 (Bug 1788621) for causing failures in browser_creditCard_heuristics.js
Log: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer?job_id=389246341&repo=autoland&lineNumber=6157
Backout: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/b018bd7eea017aa7aa5d7fa16a6dafc288a4fbf8
Flags: needinfo?(dlee)
Pushed by dlee@mozilla.com:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/0553d6f2c2f2
Add an extra rule to determine whether a form with only a cc-number field is a valid cc form r=sgalich
Comment 5•3 years ago
|
||
| bugherder | ||
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 3 years ago
status-firefox106:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → 106 Branch
| Assignee | ||
Updated•3 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(dlee)
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•