Closed
Bug 178984
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 22 years ago
flag requestee field should be disabled unless flag is requested
Categories
(Bugzilla :: User Interface, defect)
Bugzilla
User Interface
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Bugzilla 2.18
People
(Reporter: myk, Assigned: myk)
References
Details
Attachments
(2 files, 1 obsolete file)
4.36 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
2.19 KB,
image/gif
|
Details |
The flag requestee field is enabled all the time, even when a flag isn't being requested. It should be disabled until someone requests the flag (i.e. changes the pull-down menu to "?").
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
Comment 2•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 105519 [details] [diff] [review] patch v1: implements feature Thank you for making it visible by default and using javascript to hide it. :-) That way it's visible anyway if someone has javascript off. :) r= justdave a= justdave
Attachment #105519 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•22 years ago
|
||
This patch is unrotted and also fixes a bug that could cause a requestee field to appear for a flag that is already in the requested state.
Attachment #105519 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Attachment #105706 -
Flags: review?
Assignee | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Attachment #105706 -
Flags: review?
Assignee | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Attachment #105706 -
Flags: review?
Comment 4•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 105706 [details] [diff] [review] patch v2: unrotted tested on landfill, with bugs in the list "loaded" with the stuff that broke it before... Excel likes it. :-) r=justdave a=justdave
Attachment #105706 -
Flags: review? → review+
Comment 5•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 105706 [details] [diff] [review] patch v2: unrotted errr.... that comment was meant for a different patch, I got my windows swapped... review on this one coming right up though...
Attachment #105706 -
Flags: review+ → review?
Comment 6•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 105706 [details] [diff] [review] patch v2: unrotted OK, this works, except that on Mac, you can't tell it's disabled unless you try to click on it and the caret never shows up. This is the fault of both Moz and IE, Omniweb displays it correctly. To overcome this, I guess I would go as far as hiding/showing the entire UI... when you set it to ?, the ([_____]) appears to the right...
Attachment #105706 -
Flags: review? → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•22 years ago
|
||
>To overcome this, I guess I would go as far as hiding/showing the entire UI...
>when you set it to ?, the ([_____]) appears to the right...
The problem with this is that it's bad form to hide UI elements, which is why
the disabled state exists in the first place: it makes it possible for users to
see all possible options while preventing them from manipulating the ones that
don't make sense in the given state. It's unfortunate some browsers have a
buggy implementation of the feature, and I'm open to workarounds, but hiding the
element is not the solution.
The other problem with hiding the element is that it makes a generally
requestable flag (one that can be set to "?" but not requested of a specific
user) look like a specifically requestable flag. Note that we also use the
disabled state on the "create attachment" page without problems.
I think the best solution to this problem is to check in the current patch and
file bugs/register complaints against the buggy browsers; and then, if we can't
get traction on the problems within a reasonable time period, use CSS to style
the element ourselves when it is in the disabled state.
Comment 8•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 105706 [details] [diff] [review] patch v2: unrotted agreed. reversing my review.
Attachment #105706 -
Flags: review- → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•22 years ago
|
||
Checking in template/en/default/flag/list.html.tmpl; /cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/template/en/default/flag/list.html.tmpl,v <-- list.html.tmpl new revision: 1.5; previous revision: 1.4 done
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 10•22 years ago
|
||
I noticed the same problems with Moz on Linux and even IE on windows... empty disabled text boxes just don't /look/ disabled. You could probably use .css to give them a gray background or something. Another possible solution (although it would look funny and I've never seen it done before) is to set the text in the textbox to read "Disabled" (or something) and then disabling the box. On every browser I've noticed this on, the text looks noticably different in the disabled state, even if the box itself doesn't.
Comment 11•22 years ago
|
||
When both "specifically requestable" and "multiplicable" are checked, then the disable works wrong - it disables the first item, not the last. check the screenshot.
Updated•22 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 2.18
Updated•12 years ago
|
QA Contact: matty_is_a_geek → default-qa
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•