Open
Bug 1842111
Opened 1 year ago
Updated 1 year ago
Rename CPOW things in ProcessHangMonitor
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Content Processes, task)
Core
DOM: Content Processes
Tracking
()
NEW
People
(Reporter: mccr8, Unassigned)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
ProcessHangMonitor has InitiateCPOWTimeout, ShouldTimeOutCPOWs and mCPOWTimeout, which is confusing because we don't have CPOWs any more. It looks like these are still relevant, but maybe a new name would be better? ShouldTimeOutCPOWs is called from ContentParent::ShouldContinueFromReplyTimeout, so maybe they could be renamed to reply timeouts instead of CPOW timeouts.
|
Reporter | |
Comment 1•1 year ago
|
||
The comment near the top of ProcessHangMonitor.cpp includes this sentence which presumably should be updated: "The parent cancels any ongoing CPOW requests and then posts a runnable to the main thread that notifies Firefox frontend code of the hang."
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•