Reconsider restricting comments in closed Bugs
Categories
(Invalid Bugs :: General, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
People
(Reporter: masterquestionable, Unassigned)
Details
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1601392#c5
So how shall the issue be even possibly continued..?
Spamming Bugzilla with pointless new ones?
See: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=587438#c17
|
||
Comment 1•8 months ago
•
|
||
Yes, you'd need to raise a new bug if you can't comment. But do note that bugs have been closed as WONTFIX or INVALID for a reason so simply opening new bugs to complain about decisions made for good reasons is not constructive.
|
|
||
Updated•8 months ago
|
|
|
||
Updated•8 months ago
|
| Comment hidden (admin-reviewed) |
|
|
||
Updated•8 months ago
|
|
|
||
Updated•8 months ago
|
|
|
||
Updated•8 months ago
|
|
|
||
Updated•8 months ago
|
|
|
||
Comment 3•8 months ago
|
||
Please do read the Etiquette, particularly the parts about changing fields.
|
Reporter | |
Comment 4•8 months ago
|
||
Do you really read the linked..?
I'm not interested in making similar pointless debates here:
I'm here to address actual problems.
(In reply to Master ? [:masterquestionable] from comment #4)
Do you really read the linked..?
I'm not interested in making similar pointless debates here:
I'm here to address actual problems.
I'm here to reminder you that this is our professional working environment as much as it is our issue tracker.
If you cannot behave in an appropriate manner as per the Community Participation and Bugzilla Etiquette guidelines your account will be disabled.
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 6•8 months ago
|
||
My act should be in alignment with the guidelines, I believe.
If you find any misalignment: please notify, and I'll review.
Some of your actions look like inclined toward personal tastes, rather than facts.
It is alright to have personal preference. But making decisions entirely upon which would only be footgun.
(In reply to Master ? [:masterquestionable] from comment #6)
My act should be in alignment with the guidelines, I believe.
Please re-read the guidelines and adjust accordingly; pay attention to the sections on "no obligation", "no messing with other people's bugs", and "no whining about decisions".
If you find any misalignment: please notify, and I'll review.
That isn't how this works; it's on you to review and follow the guidelines. Failure to do so will result in your account being disabled.
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 8•8 months ago
|
||
[[
1. No messing with other people's bugs. Unless you are the bug assignee, or have some say over the use of their time, never change the <&>Priority or Target Milestone</&> fields. If in doubt, do not change the fields of bugs you do not own - add a comment instead, suggesting the change.
2. No whining about decisions. If another project contributor has marked a bug as INVALID, then it is invalid. Filing another duplicate of it does not change this. <&>Unless you have further evidence to support reopening a bug</&>, do not post a comment arguing that a bug resolved as INVALID or WONTFIX should be reopened.
]]
Whining or valid reasoning?
Are you interpreting it as "No disagreement ever"..?
(In reply to Master ? [:masterquestionable] from comment #8)
Whining or valid reasoning?
Are you interpreting it as "No disagreement ever"..?
No, reasonable discourse is welcome.
You're welcome to your opinion, and we will continue to be responsive to appropriately framed feedback, but you need to understand we are the decision makers especially when it comes to our issue management process and tooling.
If it helps you calibrate, this bug is not appropriately framed feedback.
| Comment hidden (off-topic) |
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 11•7 months ago
|
||
Working on closed issues appears to be fairly common:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1888400#c11
(due to the high rate of regression)
|
|
Reporter | |
Updated•7 months ago
|
Description
•