Closed
Bug 193212
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 3 years ago
Only use CJK line breaker algorithm for CJK text
Categories
(Core :: Layout: Text and Fonts, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INCOMPLETE
People
(Reporter: smontagu, Unassigned)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
(Keywords: perf)
Attachments
(1 file)
22.07 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
This is an idea I experimented with last year, but didn't find that it was much
of a performance win for pageload. Now I want to investigate its impact on
typing and editing performance, where PrepareUnicodeText() consumes a lot of
time (see figures in bug 35296).
I will resurrect my patch, unbitrot it and attach it here. The general strategy
is to set a flag in nsGenericDOMDataNode.cpp when CJK (Chinese, Japanese or
Korean) characters are present, and only use the CJK linebreaker in
nsTextTransformer when this flag is present. Otherwise we will use a simpler
linebreaker which will not have to scan for CJK characters internally.
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
Will this change make the code simpler? If not, could we add some refactoring
in the process?
Updated•22 years ago
|
OS: Windows 2000 → All
Hardware: PC → All
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•22 years ago
|
||
In principle, yes, but in the first instance I want to produce a
simple-as-possible patch for use in performance profiling.
OS: All → Windows 2000
Hardware: All → PC
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•22 years ago
|
||
This patch has at least one serious bug: the nsWesternLineBreaker can end up
being used even on CJK pages, because the first call to
nsDocument::GetLineBreaker may be before the parser has encountered any CJK
characters.
Updated•22 years ago
|
Depends on: line-breaking
Updated•21 years ago
|
Blocks: line-breaking
No longer depends on: line-breaking
It seems to me that bug 255990 suggests pretty much the opposite (and makes more sense to me).
Updated•15 years ago
|
QA Contact: ian → layout.fonts-and-text
Comment 5•3 years ago
|
||
The bug assignee didn't login in Bugzilla in the last 7 months.
:jfkthame, could you have a look please?
For more information, please visit auto_nag documentation.
Assignee: smontagu → nobody
Flags: needinfo?(jfkthame)
Comment 6•3 years ago
|
||
The code involved here has all changed; I don't think this is relevant any more.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 3 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(jfkthame)
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•