9.4% amazon largestContentfulPaint (Linux) regression on Mon August 25 2025
Categories
(Core :: Printing: Output, defect)
Tracking
()
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox-esr128 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox-esr140 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox142 | --- | wontfix |
| firefox143 | --- | wontfix |
| firefox144 | --- | affected |
People
(Reporter: intermittent-bug-filer, Unassigned)
References
(Regression)
Details
(Keywords: perf, perf-alert, regression)
Perfherder has detected a browsertime performance regression from push fa5150f4a96a5160bb0813d921d5ef4c50067f53. As author of one of the patches included in that push, we need your help to address this regression.
Please acknowledge, and begin investigating this alert within 3 business days, or the patch(es) may be backed out in accordance with our regression policy. Our guide to handling regression bugs has information about how you can proceed with this investigation.
If you have any questions or need any help with the investigation, please reach out to aesanu@mozilla.com. Alternatively, you can find help on Slack by joining #perf-help, and on Matrix you can find help by joining #perftest.
Regressions:
| Ratio | Test | Platform | Options | Absolute values (old vs new) | Performance Profiles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9% | amazon largestContentfulPaint | linux1804-64-shippable-qr | fission warm webrender | 267.98 -> 293.17 | Before/After |
Details of the alert can be found in the alert summary, including links to graphs and comparisons for each of the affected tests.
If you need the profiling jobs you can trigger them yourself from treeherder job view or ask aesanu@mozilla.com to do that for you.
You can run all of these tests on try with ./mach try perf --alert 46491
The following documentation link provides more information about this command.
Comment 1•10 months ago
|
||
Set release status flags based on info from the regressing bug 1984884
Comment 2•10 months ago
|
||
My understanding is that the same patch, among other things, also improved amazon and booking perceptualspeedindex and co, from bug 1977839, right? If so this doesn't seem particularly concerning.
Updated•10 months ago
|
Comment 3•9 months ago
|
||
(In reply to Emilio Cobos Álvarez (:emilio) from comment #2)
My understanding is that the same patch, among other things, also improved amazon and booking perceptualspeedindex and co, from bug 1977839, right? If so this doesn't seem particularly concerning.
That is right.
Updated•9 months ago
|
Description
•