Closed Bug 215596 Opened 22 years ago Closed 14 years ago

Why Mozilla Fundation doesn't officialize "Moz/Br" to be pt-BR mantainer?

Categories

(Mozilla Localizations :: pt-BR / Portuguese (Brazil), defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED INVALID

People

(Reporter: g.bitten, Assigned: gjalves)

References

()

Details

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030519 Mozilla Firebird/0.6 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030519 Mozilla Firebird/0.6 This page link to "COS Informatica" to Portuguese Brazil (pt-BR) localization. I can't understand why not link to "Moz/Br" (http://mozbr.querencialivre.rs.gov.br/). Moz/Br is a community of developers and common users, several people contribute, and they are always ready to help on their maillists and other foruns. Their localizations are always faster and with better quality. They make documents, faqs, tutorial, not only the Mozilla localization. COS Informatica is a Company. They only care with Mozilla localization. They don't interact with brazilian users. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Go to page http://www.mozilla.org/projects/l10n/mlp_status.html 2. Go to Portuguese-Brazil (pt-BR) localization website Actual Results: http://www.coslinux.com.br/mozilla.php Expected Results: http://mozbr.querencialivre.rs.gov.br/
*** Bug 215786 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Hi, The proposed support of COS Informática on Mozilla Localization Project is to provide Mozilla Localization. To provide user suport, documentation and other stuff, I strong suggest to look at mozillazine.org. I think we should converge our jobs on the same direction instead of concurrency development. Are you agreed with those ideas?
Is this still an issue ?
I don't understand. As part of Moz/BR community, I can assure all pt-BR translation are made by us. This bug has no point.
Please, mark this bug as INVALID and close it now.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.