226318 - uva.nl scroll bars don't work in Classic theme

Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 187435

(Core Graveyard :: GFX: Mac, defect)

Description

[Ruud]

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031119
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031119

Please review the URL *with Classic theme*. As you can see, the scrollbar does
not function on the layer shown (Beschrijving/Description). If you switch to
Classificatie/Classification the scrollbar does scroll. This website uses
javascript to change the visibility of layers: the visibility of the selected
layer is set to visible, the others to hidden. Ergo: the scrollbar shown in
Beschrijving/Description is the one belonging to a hidden layer.

The same problem occurs on this page:
http://ip30.eti.uva.nl/bis/insecten.php?menuentry=inleiding

The problem does not occur in the modern theme and seems to be restricted to
recent versions of Mozilla (used with Mac OS X 10.3). There's no problem in the
Classic theme of Mozilla 1.5 for PC. As the Classic theme is default in Mozilla
for OS X, I think this is quite a serious bug.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
See details.
Actual Results:  
See details.

Expected Results:  
Use Modern theme to view the site. This theme works OK.

Comment 1

[Boris Zbarsky [:bzbarsky]]

Does Mozilla use OS-native scrollbar drawing in the classic theme?  If so, this
is probably a GFX:Mac bug, not a views one...

Comment 2

[Ruud]

Yes, Mozilla uses the "aqua blue" scrollbars in the Classic theme.

Comment 3

[Stefan [:stefanh]]

--> GFX: Mac.

Comment 4

[Simon Fraser [no longer active]]

I have no time.

Comment 5

[Frankie]

Moz 2004080108 Mac OS X 10.3.5 scrolling works for me at your site.

Comment 6

[Ruud]

Yes, because we have used display: block/none to circumvent this bug. I think it's identical or at least 
similar to bug # 187435:

http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187435 

Comment 7

[Frankie]

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 187435 ***