Closed
Bug 226556
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
Still XUL.mfasl hangs: Reopen 169777!
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: General, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
EXPIRED
People
(Reporter: Klaus.Kusche, Unassigned)
Details
(Keywords: hang)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031123 Firebird/0.7
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031123 Firebird/0.7
Please reopen 169777 (see my comment there)
Please ignore the user agent in this bug,
I've problems with mozilla 1.5, I'm just using firebird now because mozilla is
so unstable...
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Can't reproduce at will, but it is guranteed to happen at random sooner or later.
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
does it happen with latest nightly build ?
If so, is it on a particular web site ?
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
Definitely not fixed, but worse than ever!
Bug 169777 comment 268 asks to open a new bug, if something is found in Mozilla
1.4a or later. Your Bug 169777 comment 272 doesn´t fit the description, people
reporting there had the problem the mozilla didn´t start.
So this is a new bug, as it is another problem, not seen in 1.2 and 1.3a, but
now in 1.5.
copy of your comment in Bug 169777
Mozilla 1.5 on Gentoo Linux.
After 10-15 minutes of intensive browsing, moz starts to react slowly and
finally stops responding to mouse or keyboard. It consumes 100 % CPU and needs
to be killed from the command line.
Any attempt to start mozilla immediately gets a SIGSEGV.
After deleting XUL.mfasl, everything is fine again (for the next 10 minutes or
so...).
Maybe your XUL.mfasl is corrupt, because you killed Mozilla?
So the getting slower isn´t due to a corrupt XUL.mfasl, but the corrupt
XUL.mfasl is due to killing Mozilla?
Can you try to kill it after a minute, way before you see Mozilla getting slower?
What is intensive browsing?
Opening a lot of text tabs, like newsgroups, or websites using flash, java, lot
of images?
You are using Gentoo linux, and Gentoo is compiled for your platform.
Did you use a binary, or compiled yourself?
Do you have themes and/or extensions installed?
Is your Java working? test available at
http://www.heise.de/security/dienste/browsercheck/tests/java.shtml
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
> Definitely not fixed, but worse than ever!
was the start of the comment of Klaus. I´ve had some problems with copying :-(
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•21 years ago
|
||
Version info: I use Gentoo's mozilla-1.5-r1, compiled myself with gcc-3.1.
It says Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031123
No special themes or extensions I'm aware of.
Mozilla is compiled with Java support, but it doesn't work (at startup, it
complains that some symbol is missing).
After some experiments, I believe that I've two separate problems:
* The corrupt XUL.mfasl. New problem.
* The slowdown and hang. Old problem.
About XUL.mfasl:
XUL.mfasl is not corrupted by killing mozilla: I remove XUL.mfasl, start moz,
immediately quit it, try to start it again --> Sig 11. Remove the file again -->
starts fine. So just starting and ending moz writes a corrupt XUL.mfasl.
This problem is new, never had it in 1.2/1.3/1.4: With these versions, I only
got a corrupt XUL.mfasl after killing moz due to the hang.
Will try to attach it.
About the hang:
I had that for all versions of moz I used so far, starting from 1.2, but it
became worse with 1.5. It happens after browsing many different web sites
(searching for products, software, visiting websites of friends, ...). Not
related to s specific site or feature, moz just "ages": Works fine for some
time, suddenly reacts noticably slower and consumes a lot of CPU when loading an
new page (but can still be terminated normally with some patience), and finally
hangs completely with 100 % CPU.
Characteristics of visited sites: Images: Some, sometimes quite a lot. Flash:
Now and then. Javascript: Rarely: I usually have it disabled and only turn it on
for pages where I really need it, problem also happens with Javascript turned
off. Tabs: none, I don't use them (but I sometimes use several browser windows,
up to five or so).
Comment 5•21 years ago
|
||
Get some stack samples. Also, what is Gentoo Linux? It sounds like it has
broken random-access i/o.
/be
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•21 years ago
|
||
Sorry, cannot upload the broken XUL.mfasl. Attachments are limited to 300 KB,
and the file is 1.8 MB...
As far as I know, Gentoo is currently number four of all Linux Dist's. It's a
source dist, like Debian. And it should be fine, it is much more stable than
redhat on my other computer, no similar problems with any other application. And
I use
only packages marked "stable", no experiments here...
And as I said, the XUL problem appeared with 1.5. I used 1.4 before on the same
system, and it didn't have the XUL.mfasl problem, so it's most likely not a
problem of my system.
About stack traces: How do I take them? Moz doesn't dump core, even when killed
with Sig 6?
Comment 7•21 years ago
|
||
Re: gentoo: http://www.gentoo.org/
iirc you download a small starter, about 16 MB, then specify your system, and
what you want, and then the files you need are downloaded and compiled,
optimized for your CPU. Very oversimplified, I don´t know enough about Linux.
They don´t use apt-get, but emerge to upgrade systems.
They are also using bugzilla, mozilla gives 463 hits in their bugzilla.
Re: XUL.mfasl
when you remove it, start mozilla and immediately quit, you get SIG11,
and if you remove it again and start, it works?
Imho Mozilla needs some time to create XUL.mfasl and to write it to disk,
did you exit Mozilla normally, or did you kill it?
I´don´t know nothin´ about gentoo, just found a bug in their bugzilla.
Unexpected Signal : 11 occurred at PC=0x40245525 Loading java applet in mozilla
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33715
Searching for Mozilla in the Bugzilla over there gave 463 bugs, mostly build
related.
Don´t think this bug is related to yours here.
Which Mozilla components are installed, and which do you use?
Do you use Mozilla Mail? Calendar?
What happens, if you delete XUL.mfasl, start mozilla, wait for a minute, and
exit. Mozilla needs some time to exit, so wait again aminute, before starting
again. Do you still get SIG11?
Comment 8•21 years ago
|
||
there is another bug of gentoo delivering SIG11
Bug 226574 often crashes if I want to open a link at derstandard.at
Comment 9•21 years ago
|
||
Feel free to test whether these random SIG11 crashes reproduce with you set the
nglayout.debug.disable_xul_fastload pref to true.
/be
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•21 years ago
|
||
1.) Setting nglayout.debug.disable_xul_fastload to true solves (or at least
circumvents) the problem.
2.) I did what Hermann Schwab describes: Delete XUL.mfasl, start mozilla, wait
some moments, quit it normally, wait some moments (bash shows completion of the
mozilla job), try to start again -->SIG11.
3.) No java here (doesn't work, but doesn't cause the crash).
4.) I use the browser and the mail component.
5.) I'm still at gcc 3.1.1 (which is very unusual for Gentoo and no longer
supported). Could the problem be that gcc 3.1.1 miscompiles mozilla when optimizing?
Comment 11•21 years ago
|
||
Re: downrev gcc -- who knows? Try a newer version.
/be
Reporter | ||
Comment 12•21 years ago
|
||
Difficult to impossible: There's a gcc ABI change between 3.1.1 and 3.2.x.
Hence, this gcc upgrade requires a complete recompile of the whole system to
make libraries and applications fit together again (which takes many days on my
notebook) - I've planned it for the summer holidays...
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
Comment 13•19 years ago
|
||
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01".
This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that
bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are
highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code.
While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we
are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce
this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a
copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and
you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug
(given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more
reproduction information if you have it.
If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not
changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved.
Thank you for your help in this matter.
The latest beta releases can be obtained from:
Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/
Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html
Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
Comment 14•19 years ago
|
||
This bug has been automatically resolved after a period of inactivity (see above
comment). If anyone thinks this is incorrect, they should feel free to reopen it.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → EXPIRED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•