User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030907
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030907
When sending or receiving a mail via SSL, I want to be able to know with what
protection level this happens:
- at least in the sent folder, it should be possible to see whether it was only
40 bits, or whether it it was better and which algorithm was used
Steps to Reproduce:
even more comfortable would be if a user can see configure the mail program such
that it displays the algortithms and key lengths before any sensitive
information leaves my client
the "gap-less security trail" RFE same applies also to the inbox
Re-assigning this RFE since MailNews - Security:General appears to be orphaned
Bug 227097 is the analogous RFE regarding the corresponding certificates
i think that this should be moved to mail/news as it applies to mozilla aswell.
see also the corresponding RFE at gnu's JavaMail
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01".
This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that
bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are
highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code.
While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we
are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce
this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a
copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and
you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug
(given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more
reproduction information if you have it.
If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not
changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved.
Thank you for your help in this matter.
The latest beta releases can be obtained from:
This bug has been automatically resolved after a period of inactivity (see above
comment). If anyone thinks this is incorrect, they should feel free to reopen it.
sorry for the spam. making bugzilla reflect reality as I'm not working on these bugs. filter on FOOBARCHEESE to remove these in bulk.