Closed Bug 235720 Opened 21 years ago Closed 11 years ago

XML bugmail

Categories

(Bugzilla :: Email Notifications, enhancement)

enhancement
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED WONTFIX

People

(Reporter: jouni, Unassigned)

References

Details

A user should be able to get bugmail in xml format. This would be massively useful for applications such as bzbot and so on. It should be fairly straightforward after email templatization (bug 84876) lands.
Depends on: 100089
No longer depends on: 84876
Depends on: 275636
No longer depends on: 100089
Kick all my Bugzilla bugs back to the component default owner.
Assignee: preed → email-notifications
QA Contact: mattyt-bugzilla → default-qa
Putting this bug in our radar for 2.24. Parsing XML emails would be much easier than the actual plain text format. A must for Bugzilla 2.24/3.0. :)
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 2.24
(In reply to comment #2) > A must for Bugzilla 2.24/3.0. :) Only a must if somebody decides to work on it, though. There's pretty much no chance that I'll be working on it for 2.24/3.0.
I suspect I might look at this...
This bug is retargetted to Bugzilla 3.2 for one of the following reasons: - it has no assignee (except the default one) - we don't expect someone to fix it in the next two weeks (i.e. before we freeze the trunk to prepare Bugzilla 3.0 RC1) - it's not a blocker If you are working on this bug and you think you will be able to submit a patch in the next two weeks, retarget this bug to 3.0. If this bug is something you would like to see implemented in 3.0 but you are not a developer or you don't think you will be able to fix this bug yourself in the next two weeks, please *do not* retarget this bug. If you think this bug should absolutely be fixed before we release 3.0, either ask on IRC or use the "blocking3.0 flag".
Target Milestone: Bugzilla 3.0 → Bugzilla 3.2
Untargeting this bug until it's actually taken by somebody.
Target Milestone: Bugzilla 3.2 → ---
Blocks: 65477
Depends on: 466968
No longer blocks: 65477
Depends on: 589128
This is too specific of a use case; if it's really needed, it could be done via APIs or as an extension.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.