Closed Bug 239563 Opened 21 years ago Closed 20 years ago

crash if window.close() called in javascript such as 'onMouseDown' [@ nsEventStateManager::SendFocusBlur ]

Categories

(Core :: DOM: Events, defect)

x86
All
defect
Not set
critical

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: brandon, Assigned: bryner)

References

()

Details

(Keywords: crash, testcase)

Crash Data

Attachments

(5 files)

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040206 Firefox/0.8 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040206 Firefox/0.8 In a popup window, clicking this button will cause firefox to crash: <button OnMouseDown="javascript:window.close();">Cancel</button> Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create popup window in javascript 2. click the button made by: <button OnMouseDown="javascript:window.close();">Cancel</button> Actual Results: Under Windows: Access violation, dissasembly yields it to be a null reference exception. Expected Results: closed the popup
confirmed linux seamonkey 1.7b and firefox cvs 20040331
Assignee: firefox → events
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Component: General → DOM: Events
Ever confirmed: true
Product: Firefox → Browser
QA Contact: ian
Version: unspecified → Trunk
Attached file testcase
Attached file stack
Talkback TB11798W Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040316
The cause of the crash is pretty straightforward... the script event handler (called when nsHTMLButtonElement::HandleDOMEvent calls the superclass HandleDOMEvent) unhooks the pres shell from the pres context, then the button element calls SetContentState() which calls SendFocusBlur() which expects it to be there. This particular problem could obviously be fixed by null checking in EventStateManager::SendFocusBlur. However, it really seems like the right time to check for destruction is right after we do something that could cause destruction, like call a script event handler. That could be a pretty good-sized change though. Anyone have any opinions?
Would it make any sense to put destruction off on a PLEvent when window.close() is called instead of doing it synchronously?
I've considered that before; it would also allow us to eliminate kungFuDeathGrips on various objects around dispatching an event and some other null checks we do after dispatching events. We'd probably need to synchronously call some method on the window object so that it doesn't respond to any further method calls...
Hmm... GlobalWindowImpl::Close() already posts a close event unless the caller is chrome (why unless??). Except if there is a JS context on the stack, we close off the JS context's termination function instead of off the event. We should probably close off the event unconditionally. So perhaps the thing to do is: 1) Set a termination function that will call nsIScriptGlobalObject::SetScriptsEnabled(PR_FALSE) (to prevent JS stuff in the window from running). 2) Close for real off the event. 3) (maybe) add some mIsClosed checks in various places.
*** Bug 239631 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Keywords: crash, testcase
Summary: crash if window.close() called in javascript such as 'onMouseDown' → crash if window.close() called in javascript such as 'onMouseDown' [@ nsEventStateManager::SendFocusBlur ]
*** Bug 271727 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
No solution, but some more clues: When a main page opens a child window containing an applet and the applet closes the child window: 1) When the applet in child window calls: JSObject win = JSObject.getWindow(this); win.eval("setTimeout(\"window.close()\",200);"); The window closes and everything is OK. 2) When the applet in child window calls: JSObject win = JSObject.getWindow(this); win.eval("window.close();"); The window closes BUT FireFox is dead as described in this bugzilla. When a main page opens a child containing HTML that closes the child: 1. Click on linked text (N.B.: class closeButton is CSS simulating the look of a close button). OK. No crash. <a class="closeButton" href="#null" onclick="javascript:window.close();">Close</a> 2. Click on a linked image. OK. No crash. <a href="#null" onclick="javascript:window.close();"><img src="closeButton.gif" border="0"/></a> 3. Click on a scripted image. OK. No crash. <img src="closeButton.gif" onclick="javascript:window.close();"/> 4. Click on a button that is not inside a form. FAILS crash. <p><input type="button" value="close" onclick="javascript:window.close();"/></p> 5. Click on a button inside a form. FAILS crash. <form><input type="button" value="close" onclick="javascript:window.close();"/></form> 6. Click on a button inside a form that calls a function. FAILS crash. <form><input type="button" value="close" onclick="closeFun();"/></form> 7. Click on a button inside a form that calls a delayed function. FAILS crash. <form><input type="button" value="close" onclick="closeFunDelay();"/></form>
Flags: blocking1.8b2?
One other interesting thought... What if the mousedown JS were in an iframe, and instead of calling close() it removed the iframe from its parent document? As I recall, that currently causes immediate destruction of the window and document in the iframe; that ought to lead to crashes similar to this, right?
Here's a pretty simple work-around. When the document loads, redefine the listener that fires when you push a "Close" button. And write the listener to immediately stop event propagation. //----------------------------------------------------- function fixAtLoad(){ var ara=document.getElementsByTagName("input"); for(i=0;i<ara.length;i++){ if((ara[i].getAttribute("type").toLowerCase()=="button") &&(ara[i].getAttribute("value").toLowerCase()=="close")){ ara[i].onclick=null; ara[i].addEventListener("mousedown",closeButton,true); }}}//if, for, fix //----------------------------------------------------- function closeButton(e){ e.preventDefault(); e.stopPropagation(); window.close(); }//closeButton //-----------------------------------------------------
This fixes the crash for me... look ok?
Assignee: events → bryner
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #174316 - Flags: superreview?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #174316 - Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Comment on attachment 174316 [details] [diff] [review] patch per boris's suggestion Actually I'd like jst to look at this too.
Attachment #174316 - Flags: review?(bzbarsky) → review?(jst)
Brian, your patch doesn't fix this testcase, does it?
(In reply to comment #16) > Created an attachment (id=174340) [edit] > Testcase per comment 12 > > Brian, your patch doesn't fix this testcase, does it? No. Maybe to fix that we should add similar code in nsSubDocumentFrame::Destroy (in particular, to defer the call to nsDocumentViewer::Hide()).
What if instead of removing the iframe I just changed its display or position (while keeping it in the same place), and forced out the style change (causing a frame reconstruct)? If we keep the old viewer around, wouldn't that mean that we end up dispatching events after the mousedown to the wrong (about to die) frame tree? (Maybe this is not an issue; I'm just being an evil tester here).
Attached patch "safe" patchSplinter Review
Let's just null check as needed until we can unify presshell and prescontext.
Attachment #174408 - Flags: superreview?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #174408 - Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Comment on attachment 174408 [details] [diff] [review] "safe" patch r+sr=bzbarsky
Attachment #174408 - Flags: superreview?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #174408 - Flags: superreview+
Attachment #174408 - Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #174408 - Flags: review+
Attachment #174408 - Flags: approval1.8b?
Comment on attachment 174408 [details] [diff] [review] "safe" patch a=asa for checkin to 1.8b
Attachment #174408 - Flags: approval1.8b? → approval1.8b+
*** Bug 282568 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment on attachment 174316 [details] [diff] [review] patch per boris's suggestion Seems reasonable...
Attachment #174316 - Flags: superreview?(bzbarsky) → superreview+
Attachment #174316 - Flags: review?(jst)
This was checked in, forgot to mark it fixed.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Oops, my bad. This was _not_ checked in previously. I just checked it in now. Someone with appropriate permissions, please clear the blocking flag.
Thanks. Today's trunk build doesn't have this problem. But in the case browser.link.open_newwindow is 0, Mozilla still crashes. Is this another bug?
Possibly, yes. File separately, cc me and bryner? Post talkback incident ID if you have one?
Today's build doesn't crash with any value of browser.link.open_newwindow. Other bug may fix also this bug. Thanks.
Flags: blocking1.8b2?
Crash Signature: [@ nsEventStateManager::SendFocusBlur ]
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: