In patch to bug 245924 we don't take into account that some users will may want to style by css different group of links in are different ways (e.g. actions-group will be green, edit-group will be yellow and saved-searches group will be an other favorite color). The our previous implementation of footer has made this impossible, because we assign ID not for all group=links+name_of_group but only for name_of_group: <div class="group"> <div id="link-edit">Edit:</div> <div class="links"> ...... </div> </div> The present CSS specification doesn't allow to access parent properties from child rule. We can assign ID for group=links+name_of_group, and when all other users can design by CSS both whole group and links or name_of_group with help of context selectors. We have rewritten our previous patch from this point of view. Now code looks like: <div id="links-edit"> <div class="label">Edit:</div> <div class="links"> ...... </div> </div> Sorry for your inconvenience.
Created attachment 151552 [details] [diff] [review] Provides an ability to style different group of links in diffrent ways in footer
Comment on attachment 151552 [details] [diff] [review] Provides an ability to style different group of links in diffrent ways in footer The change makes sense, but this patch causes the content of the useful links box to get unnecessary extra top padding. Strangely, you didn't change any padding in this patch. Perhaps the existing padding-top rule gets misinterpreted for some reason?
Created attachment 152127 [details] [diff] [review] Second attempt. We have corrected code as far as could understand you. If it is not difficult for you, next time specify browser and its version, in which you observe one or another defect, please. It will help us very much. If you have opportunity, the best variant is to give screenshot with defect.
Comment on attachment 152127 [details] [diff] [review] Second attempt. Sorry, I should have known you'd need to know the browser. :-/ I tested in Mozilla Firefox 0.9 on Linux. The new patch still changes formatting on the same browser, but less so, and it still looks good. r=myk
Minor low-risk update to previously checked in patch. a=myk and checking in for contributor without CVS access: Checking in css/global.css; /cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/css/global.css,v <-- global.css new revision: 1.4; previous revision: 1.3 done Checking in template/en/default/global/useful-links.html.tmpl; /cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/template/en/default/global/useful-links.html.tmpl,v <-- useful-links.html.tmpl new revision: 1.27; previous revision: 1.26 done