User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040626 Firefox/0.9.1 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040626 Firefox/0.9.1 bugzilla.mozilla.org seems to be the only part of mozilla.org that still carries the OLD look. Applying the new stylesheet used in all the other mozilla.org sites would give bugzilla a much needed refreshing look.. After all, the old look may not look as inviting to new bug reporters, and giving it a modern look may attract more bug reporters? I know that it's not a problem with bugzilla itself, because redhat's installation of bugzilla is very nicely matched with the main redhat site theme.. http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/ Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3.
work-in-progress at http://webtools.mozilla.org/bztest/
Assignee: endico → justdave
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Nice to know work is going on for this. If i may make one suggestion on this though (i realize this is still a WIP), the text font and size look a little weird. May i suggest a smaller font? Perhaps one or two points smaller? Thanks for the update,
Work wasn't in progress. :) I threw that together after you opened the bug. A couple of us spent an hour or so screwing with it this afternoon, have another look. :)
Would this be a good opportunity also to revamp the custom index.html.tmpl? There are several bug reports on it. I'll gather up the feedback and try and put something together. Gerv
You might like to fix bug 119153 while you are there. Gerv
What are the chances of getting new ids/classes on this install? Should that be a new bug? Redhat's bugzilla makes me very, very jealous. I attempted to copy some of the better looking stuff from their install using the @-moz-document rules, but am limited by the lack of the same classes/ids (I imagine it's possible to get a similar effect without them, but I don't know enough css)
We're going to pick this up with the next upgrade actually. It's mostly already been checked in upstream, we'll have to make a few local tweaks for b.m.o.
something i think that's missing is a guide for people towards the support options available for mozilla. with that in mind, i've thrown together a *rough* bmo index page.. http://glob.com.au/bmo/
(In reply to comment #8) > with that in mind, i've thrown together a *rough* bmo index page.. Did you look at the one we're already set to deploy? See bug 279823 (you can also find it by following the dependencies on this bug ;)
> Did you look at the one we're already set to deploy? ah. i'd looked at it before, when it was first posted, then promptly forgot. sorry
maybe you could add the bugzilla bug icon on the main banner to the right of the mozilla text.
(In reply to comment #11) > maybe you could add the bugzilla bug icon on the main banner to the right of the > mozilla text. this was discussed and veto'ed on the developer's list: http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?list=developers&func=archive-get-part&extra=200501/193
This will be fixed with tonight's upgrade.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Component: Bugzilla: Other b.m.o Issues → General
Product: mozilla.org → bugzilla.mozilla.org
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.