Closed
Bug 252011
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
Remove extra param in comments section for cancel() in nsIWebBrowserPrint.idl
Categories
(Core :: Printing: Output, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: depman1, Assigned: domob)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: helpwanted, Whiteboard: [good first bug])
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
1.13 KB,
patch
|
bzbarsky
:
review+
bzbarsky
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
nsIWebBrowserPrint.idl:
There's no @param Cancel in cancel(); it has no parameters.
The comment should be removed.
Updated•20 years ago
|
Keywords: helpwanted
Whiteboard: [good first bug]
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
You thought of something like this?
Attachment #171566 -
Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
Daniel, in general more context makes patches easier to review... -up8 are good
options for making a diff.
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
Of course, normally I use -u8, but not when just changing a comment...
(Or should I even then?)
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
Well, I can't tell whether this change is correct, because I can't see the
function declaration in the diff, nor the rest of the comment... so yes, you
should use enough context to make the patch reviewable any time you make a
patch. ;)
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
Oh, I see. That's reason enough...
Sorry!
Attachment #171566 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #171649 -
Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #171566 -
Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 171649 [details] [diff] [review]
Context 8 lines
Ah, thank you. r+sr=bzbarsky; I'll check this in when the tree opens.
Attachment #171649 -
Flags: superreview+
Attachment #171649 -
Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #171649 -
Flags: review+
Comment on attachment 171649 [details] [diff] [review]
Context 8 lines
>+ * Cancels the current print
current print *what*?
It's best if the documentation be written in English.
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•20 years ago
|
||
I'm sorry, but that's what already was present in the original file. Would you
prefer to see "the current print job" or something like that?
Updated•20 years ago
|
Assignee: elliot.lee → domob
Comment 10•20 years ago
|
||
Fixed for 1.8b.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 11•20 years ago
|
||
i dunno, does it mean that? does it only cancel prints and not previews? if what
you wrote is what it means, then yes i'd rather see that.
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•20 years ago
|
||
I also don't know what it means exactly. As I wrote, that is, what was already
present in the file. I've just removed the missplaced @param.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•