Closed
Bug 258763
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 21 years ago
{inc} Nested position: absolute divs and tables display incorrectly until reflow
Categories
(Core :: Layout: Positioned, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: Shelley.Storch, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: testcase, Whiteboard: [sg:nse])
Attachments
(3 files, 8 obsolete files)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8a3) Gecko/20040817
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8a3) Gecko/20040817
Had to accomodate the fact you did not support document.all yet, but we worked
around this missing item.
Now we are fighting positioning. Standard HTML table within table cell
positioning is not working. The submenu position is generally left of the main
menu item even when we are relative or absolute on our positioning by stating
left or right. In addition, we tried several other options as well.
Was wondering the estimated time that these two items were scheduled to be
fixed? I see a couple similar problems, but I do not know if these are exactly
the same.
Sorry if this is a duplicate, but I am in need of information for development
reasons.
Thanks,
Shelley Storch
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Login to web page
2. Try hanging menu in portal
3. Modules/PreAuth to next level of the menu
Actual Results:
Orginally, no hanging menus would appear because we were using document.all and
in the JavaScript Console it stated that it Document.All has no properties.
We changed the document.all feature with a very long IF statement. Then when we
went down the menu Modules to PreAuth, the next menu was generally to the left
of the PreAuth Item making it difficult to select any of the sub menu items.
Expected Results:
The submenu should of been right of the PreAuth Menu
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
No evidence of a security exploit, clearing security flag.
(Is this a bug report or a request for help? unclear, but requests for help
would get better responses in user support newsgroups or irc.)
Group: security
Whiteboard: [sg:nse]
Comment 2•22 years ago
|
||
Please attach a reduced testcase for the positioning problem using this URL:
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?bugid=258763&action=enter
| Reporter | ||
Comment 3•22 years ago
|
||
We are more than willing to give you a login to our site so that you can
compare the differences between IE and Mozilla/Netscape.
If you would like to pursue a login you may contact me via e-mail and I'll get
you the information needed.
Thanks,
Shelley Storch
Comment 4•22 years ago
|
||
Shelley, are the layout differences visible in the source you attached here? If
so, what are they (screenshots)? If not, can you e-mail me the login info and
I'll take a look.
Comment 5•22 years ago
|
||
Something to do with bug 201897 (via bug 228781)?
Updated•22 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Keywords: testcase
Summary: Table within Table Menuing/Document.All → {inc} Nested position: absolute divs and tables display incorrectly until reflow
Updated•22 years ago
|
Attachment #158752 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 6•22 years ago
|
||
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8a3) Gecko/20040904
Firefox/0.9.1+
Comment 7•22 years ago
|
||
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8a3) Gecko/20040904
Firefox/0.9.1+
Comment 8•22 years ago
|
||
IE 6 SP2
Comment 9•22 years ago
|
||
Opera 7.54
Comment 10•22 years ago
|
||
I see a completely different rendering with winxp 2004090507 seamonkey
Comment 11•22 years ago
|
||
Moving to R & A Pos.
Component: Layout: Tables → Layout: R & A Pos
QA Contact: core.layout.tables → core.layout.r-and-a-pos
Comment 12•22 years ago
|
||
"Reflow" may not have been the best word to use. To get the "after" rendering,
resize the window.
(In reply to comment #10)
> I see a completely different rendering with winxp 2004090507 seamonkey
What do you see? (attach screenshots)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 13•22 years ago
|
||
Jason,
I apologize for not attaching the screenshots. This was the first time I have
ever reported a bug to Mozilla. With other companies I have dealt with like
Hyland Software, the makers of OnBase, I dealt directly with the
developer/technical support so this process is entirely different.
I was not sure what to expect. Hopefully, this will shed some light as to why
I sent you the screenshots.
I'll try to adhere to your reporting policy a little better.
Comment 14•22 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #13)
> I apologize for not attaching the screenshots.
Just to clarify: I wasn't asking you for screenshots in my latest comment, I was
asking Bernd for screenshots of what he sees.
Yes, ideally you should've attached screenshots or the files at first, but you
gave them to me on request. So all's well.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 15•22 years ago
|
||
Attaching the original screenshot sent to Jason.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 16•22 years ago
|
||
The second screnshot showing the IE Alignment sent to Jason.
Comment 17•21 years ago
|
||
The testcase worksforme, Mozilla 1.8a5 and 2004-11-25-06 trunk on Linux.
Shelley, can you try Mozilla 1.8a5 on your site please.
http://www.mozilla.org/releases/
| Reporter | ||
Comment 18•21 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #17)
> The testcase worksforme, Mozilla 1.8a5 and 2004-11-25-06 trunk on Linux.
> Shelley, can you try Mozilla 1.8a5 on your site please.
> http://www.mozilla.org/releases/
Downloaded the Windows version of 1.8a5, requesting clarification of whether
change was incorporated to the Windows release prior to answering. Please
specify. Thanks.
Comment 19•21 years ago
|
||
Shelley, I am using 1.8a5 for Windows (specifically, the Nov 25 build), and I no
longer see the bug that was exhibited in the testcase labelled "reduced
testcase". So yes, what we think was the problem is now fixed in the latest
builds. But it could be that there is another bug (with your code or with
Mozilla's) that is affecting your site, so we need either confirmation that it's
fixed or access to the site to keep trying to solve the problem.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 20•21 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #19)
> Shelley, I am using 1.8a5 for Windows (specifically, the Nov 25 build)
Thanks for the clarification.
I have access granted to our test server please use this address:
https://www.accessta.com/CustomerTest/default.aspx
username: mozilla
password: welcome
In the new version of Mozilla the 1.8a5 we were seeing the second table left
justified so it would instantiate over the first table menu. I will post a
view so you can see.
In the case of IE the second table is right justified to the length of the menu
word. I'll send a picture of the IE so you get the general idea.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 21•21 years ago
|
||
This corresponds to my new message I sent today.
Second picture on the way.
Thanks
| Reporter | ||
Comment 22•21 years ago
|
||
This corresponds to my message today.
Thanks
Comment 23•21 years ago
|
||
This looks like an IE bug.
Attachment #159038 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #159039 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #159040 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #159041 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #159042 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #159238 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #159239 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 24•21 years ago
|
||
Mozilla's rendering of the testcase in comment 23 is correct. See
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visudet.html#static-position
In the future, please report new problems by filing new bug reports, we prefer
to only handle one issue per bug report.
The original problem is WORKSFORME.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
OS: Windows 2000 → All
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #159038 -
Attachment is obsolete: false
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #159039 -
Attachment is obsolete: false
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #159040 -
Attachment is obsolete: false
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #167425 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #167426 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #167480 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•